Review of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI for multiple myeloma and its precursors (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering myeloma)

The last decades, increasing research has been conducted on dynamic contrast–enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI techniques in multiple myeloma and its precursors. Apart from anatomical sequences which are prone to interpretation errors due to anatomical variants, other pathologies and subjective evaluation of signal intensities, dynamic contrast–enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI provide additional information on microenvironmental changes in bone marrow and are helpful in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of plasma cell dyscrasias. Diffusion-weighted imaging provides information on diffusion (restriction) of water molecules in bone marrow and in malignant infiltration. Qualitative evaluation by visually assessing images with different diffusion sensitising gradients and quantitative evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient are studied extensively. Dynamic contrast–enhanced imaging provides information on bone marrow vascularisation, perfusion, capillary resistance, vascular permeability and interstitial space, which are systematically altered in different disease stages and can be evaluated in a qualitative and a (semi-)quantitative manner. Both diffusion restriction and abnormal dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI parameters are early biomarkers of malignancy or disease progression in focal lesions or in regions with diffuse abnormal signal intensities. The added value for both techniques lies in better detection and/or characterisation of abnormal bone marrow otherwise missed or misdiagnosed on anatomical MRI sequences. Increased detection rates of focal lesions or diffuse bone marrow infiltration upstage patients to higher disease stages, provide earlier access to therapy and slower disease progression and allow closer monitoring of high-risk patients. Despite promising results, variations in imaging protocols, scanner types and post-processing methods are large, thus hampering universal applicability and reproducibility of quantitative imaging parameters. The myeloma response assessment and diagnosis system and the international myeloma working group provide a systematic multicentre approach on imaging and propose which parameters to use in multiple myeloma and its precursors in an attempt to overcome the pitfalls of dynamic contrast–enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging.