A randomized controlled trial in travel demand management

被引:0
作者
Adam Rosenfield
John P. Attanucci
Jinhua Zhao
机构
[1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
来源
Transportation | 2020年 / 47卷
关键词
Travel demand management; Nudge; Randomized controlled trial; Behavior change;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a trial aimed at reducing parking demand at a large urban employer through an informational campaign and monetary incentives. A 6-week randomized controlled trial was conducted with (N = 2000) employee commuters at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, all of whom frequently drove to campus. Split into four arms of five hundred each, one group received weekly informational emails highlighting MIT’s various new transportation benefits; a second group received monetary rewards for reducing their frequency of parking; a third group received both interventions, while a control group was monitored with no intervention. The paper aims to examine how behavioral incentives, namely targeted information provision and monetary rewards, can be used independently or in combination to encourage alternatives to drive-alone commuting. Success was measured as the extent to which drivers decreased their frequency of parking and increased their use of alternative modes during and after the campaign. While the combined treatment group contained the highest number of top-performing participants, no statistically significant differences-in-differences were observed amongst the treatment arms compared to the control. A post-experiment survey indicated a widespread increase in awareness of employer transportation benefits, and a much larger stated shift from driving towards transit than was supported by passively-collected data. Survey results suggested that while intent to reduce car use existed, complaints of insufficient quality of transit service and relative convenience of driving suppressed modal shifts. Most importantly, the discrepancy between self-reported and actual behavior change highlights important limitations and biases of survey-based travel behavior research.
引用
收藏
页码:1907 / 1932
页数:25
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Ajzen I(1991)The theory of planned behavior Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 179-211
[2]  
Anable J(2005)Complacent car addicts or aspiring environmentalists? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory Transp. Policy 12 65-78
[3]  
Arnott B(2014)Efficacy of behavioural interventions for transport behaviour change: systematic review, meta-analysis and intervention coding Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 11 133-840
[4]  
Rehackova L(2006)Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study Environ. Behav. 38 820-26
[5]  
Errington L(2017)The impact of voluntary travel behavior change measures: a meta-analytical comparison of quasi-experimental and experimental evidence Transp. Res. Part A 100 16-57
[6]  
Sniehotta FF(2007)Factors affecting worksite mode choice: findings from Portland, Oregon Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 1994 51-3962
[7]  
Roberts J(2007)Chapter 61 using randomization in development economics research: a toolkit Handb. Dev. Econ. 4 3895-23
[8]  
Araujo-Soares V(2008)Interrupting habitual car use: the importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 11 10-95
[9]  
Bamberg S(1993)Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning J. Consum. Res. 20 303-102
[10]  
Bamberg S(2003)What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change Transportation 30 81-79