Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings

被引:5
作者
Visser R. [1 ]
Barber A.-E. [1 ,2 ]
X A. [2 ]
Wheatcroft S. [2 ]
Mullen P. [2 ]
Armes J. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Surrey, School of Health Sciences, Guildford
[2] Revolving Doors Agency, 90 London Rd, Elephant and Castle, London
关键词
Cancer; Co-production; Experts by experience; Healthcare; Lived experience; Patient and public involvement; Peer research; Prison;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-021-00284-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient and public involvement is increasingly considered important in health research. This paper reflects, from both academic and lived experience perspectives, on involving people with lived experience in a study exploring cancer care in prison and how by doing this it enriched the research process. Methods: This paper is based on written and verbal reflections of the lived experience researchers and academic researchers involved in a study exploring the diagnosis and treatment of people with cancer in prison. The study comprised interviews with people with cancer in prison, prison healthcare staff, oncology specialists and custodial staff. Lived experience researchers were involved throughout the research process, including co-conducting interviews with patients and analysing interviews. Results: This paper highlights the importance and value of including lived experience researchers across the research process. We reflect on how lived experience of prison shapes the experience of conducting interviews and analysing data gathered in prison. We reflect on the working relationships between academic and lived experience researchers. We demonstrate how prison research is challenging, but collaboration between lived experience and academic researchers can help to better prepare for the field, to ask more meaningful questions and to create rapport with participants. These types of collaborations can be powerful avenues for skill development for both academic and lived experience researchers, but they require an investment of time and a willingness for shared learning. Conclusions: For academics and lived experience researchers to collaborate successfully and meaningfully care needs to be taken to develop open, honest and equal working relationships. Skills development for academic and lived experience researchers is important. A commitment to building and maintaining relationships is crucial. Having a third party as a mediator can facilitate and foster these relationships. Particularly with people with lived experience of prison it is essential to put the ‘do no harm’ principle into practice and to have support in place to minimise this. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Brett J., Staniszewska S., Mockford C., Herron-Marx S., Hughes J., Tysall C., Suleman R., Et al., A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities, Patient, 7, pp. 387-395, (2014)
  • [2] Malterud K., Elvbakken K.T., Patients participating as co-researchers in Health Research: a systematic review of outcomes and experiences, Scand J Public Health, (2020)
  • [3] Awenat Y.F., Moore C., Gooding P.A., Ulph F., Mirza A., Pratt D., Improving the quality of prison research: a qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research, Health Expect, 21, 1, pp. 100-109, (2018)
  • [4] MacInnes D., Beer D., Keeble P., Rees D., Reid L., Service-user involvement in forensic mental health care research: areas to consider when developing a collaborative study, J Ment Health, 20, 5, pp. 464-472, (2011)
  • [5] Crocker J.C., Boylan A.-M., Bostock J., Locock L., Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in Health Research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study, Health Expect, 20, 3, pp. 519-528, (2017)
  • [6] Buck G., Harriot P., Ryan K., Ryan N., Tomczak P., All our justice: people with convictions and ‘participatory’ criminal justice, The Routledge Handbook of service user involvement in human services research and education, pp. 285-295, (2020)
  • [7] Earle R., Insider and out: Making sense of a prison experience and a research experience, Qual Inq, 20, 4, pp. 429-438, (2014)
  • [8] Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. Southampton
  • [9] Alpha House, (2018)
  • [10] Dawn A., Paul Dawson L.C., Bliss Gibbons S.E.N., Laura Gill J.G.