Technology and the possibility of global environmental science

被引:0
作者
Mary Tiles
机构
[1] University of Hawai’i,Department of Philosophy
来源
Synthese | 2009年 / 168卷
关键词
Technology; Computer models; Climate science; Prediction; Global environmental science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Global environmental science, in its current configuration as predominantly interdisciplinary earth systems analysis, owes its existence to technological development in three respects. (1) Environmental impacts of globalization of corporate and military industrial development linked to widespread use of new technologies prompted investigation of ways to understand and anticipate the global nature of such impacts. (2) Extension of the reach of technology itself demands extension of attempts to anticipate and control the environment in which the technology is to function. Thus as the reach becomes global, the environment in question is also global. (3) Such global studies cannot get far without the development of command, control and information technologies (computers, satellites, automated remote sensing devices) which are crucial for data gathering, storage, and analysis and for the simulation modeling, crucial to theory testing and prediction. This network of dependence on technological development gives the global environmental sciences a rather distinctive epistemological profile, one in which some distinctions that we had thought were clear, on the basis of models of classic laboratory sciences (such as those between experiment and deduction or representation and instrument), turn out to be far from clear. In consequence there needs to be a careful evaluation of the extent to which, or the ways in which, these sciences can provide bases for policy decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 452
页数:19
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Hubbard J.H.(1999)The forced damped pendulum: Chaos, complication and control The American Mathematical Monthly. 106 741-758
[2]  
Oreskes N.(1994)Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences Science 263 641-644
[3]  
Frechette K.(1996)Representing uncertainty in global climate change acience and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority Science, Technology & Human Values 21 274-302
[4]  
Belitz K.(1999)Balancing acts: Rational agency and efficacious action International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 289-300
[5]  
Shackley S.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[6]  
Wynne B.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Tiles M.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined