Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results

被引:0
|
作者
Thomas Auer
Michael Edlinger
Jasmin Bektic
Udo Nagele
Thomas Herrmann
Georg Schäfer
Friedrich Aigner
Daniel Junker
机构
[1] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Radiology
[2] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics
[3] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Urology
[4] Abteilung für Urologie und Andrologie,Landeskrankenhaus Hall
[5] Medizinische Hochschule Hannover,Klinik für Urologie und Urologische Onkologie
[6] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Pathology
来源
World Journal of Urology | 2017年 / 35卷
关键词
Multiparametric MRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 693
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI
    Barrett, T.
    Rajesh, A.
    Rosenkrantz, A. B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    Turkbey, B.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 841 - 852
  • [22] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Steiger, Philipp
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    CANCER IMAGING, 2016, 16
  • [23] PI-RADS v2.1: moving towards clarity (comments on the updated version)
    Rubtsova, N. A.
    Mishchenko, A., V
    Danilov, V. V.
    Gulin, G. A.
    Alekseev, B. Ya
    Kaprin, A. D.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (02): : 15 - 28
  • [24] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Philipp Steiger
    Harriet C. Thoeny
    Cancer Imaging, 16
  • [25] Re: PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know. A reply
    Barrett, T.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (09) : 935 - 935
  • [26] Prebiopsy biparametric MRI: differences of PI-RADS version 2 in patients with different PSA levels
    Choi, M. H.
    Lee, Y. J.
    Jung, S. E.
    Rha, S. E.
    Byun, J. Y.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (09) : 810 - 817
  • [27] Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Young Joon
    Jung, Seung Eun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (04) : 839 - 846
  • [28] PI-RADS Version 2.1: A Critical Review, From the AJR Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Baroni, Ronaldo H.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Costa, Daniel
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Raman, Steven S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (01) : 20 - 32
  • [29] Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and 2 in a Cohort of 245 Patients with Histopathological Reference and Long-Term Follow-Up
    De Visschere, Pieter
    Pattyn, Eva
    Ost, Piet
    Claeys, Tom
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Villeirs, Geert
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 100 (01):
  • [30] Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 1 and version 2 and combination with apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of biopsy outcome
    Ryznarova, Zuzana
    Keller, Jiri
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Zachoval, Roman
    Capek, Vaclav
    Malikova, Hana
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 40 (01) : 41 - 50