Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results

被引：0
|
作者：
Thomas Auer
Michael Edlinger
Jasmin Bektic
Udo Nagele
Thomas Herrmann
Georg Schäfer
Friedrich Aigner
Daniel Junker
机构：
[1] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Radiology
[2] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics
[3] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Urology
[4] Abteilung für Urologie und Andrologie,Landeskrankenhaus Hall
[5] Medizinische Hochschule Hannover,Klinik für Urologie und Urologische Onkologie
[6] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Pathology
来源：
World Journal of Urology | 2017年 / 35卷
关键词：
Multiparametric MRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：687 / 693
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results
    Auer, Thomas
    Edlinger, Michael
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Nagele, Udo
    Herrmann, Thomas
    Schaefer, Georg
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Junker, Daniel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (05) : 687 - 693
  • [2] Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Kido, Ayumu
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Miyaji, Yoshiyuki
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Sone, Teruki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 121
  • [3] PI-RADS Version 2: A Pictorial Update
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2016, 36 (05) : 1354 - 1372
  • [4] Implications of PI-RADS Version 1 and Updated Version 2 on the Scoring of Prostatic Lesions in Multiparametric MRI
    Haas, M.
    Guenzel, K.
    Penzkofer, T.
    Maxeiner, A.
    Fischer, T.
    Miller, K.
    Hamm, B.
    Asbach, P.
    Cash, H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2016, 47 (05) : 383 - 387
  • [5] A practical primer on PI-RADS version 2: a pictorial essay
    Horn, Gary Lloyd, Jr.
    Hahn, Peter Florin
    Tabatabaei, Shahin
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (05) : 899 - 906
  • [6] Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Becker, Anton S.
    Cornelius, Alexander
    Reiner, Cacilia S.
    Stocker, Daniel
    Ulbrich, Erika J.
    Barth, Borna K.
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 94 : 58 - 63
  • [7] The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI
    Song, Jihui
    Zhao, Chenglin
    Zhang, Fei
    Yuan, Yingdi
    Wang, Lee M.
    Sah, Vivek
    Zhang, Jun
    Weng, Wencai
    Yang, Zhenghan
    Wang, Zhenchang
    Wang, Liang
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (02) : 704 - 712
  • [8] The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI
    Jihui Song
    Chenglin Zhao
    Fei Zhang
    Yingdi Yuan
    Lee M. Wang
    Vivek Sah
    Jun Zhang
    Wencai Weng
    Zhenghan Yang
    Zhenchang Wang
    Liang Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 704 - 712
  • [9] Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Walker, Stephanie M.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Sanford, Thomas
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1098 - 1103
  • [10] Correlation between Intraprostatic PSMA Uptake and MRI PI-RADS of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2.0 and PI-RADS Version 2.1
    Zhao, Jing
    Mangarova, Dilyana B.
    Brangsch, Julia
    Kader, Avan
    Hamm, Bernd
    Brenner, Winfried
    Makowski, Marcus R.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 13
12345