An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Six Sigma Project Selection

被引:0
作者
Perçin S. [1 ]
Kahraman C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Business Administration, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon
[2] Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Macka, Istanbul
关键词
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Delphi Method; Fuzzy Sets; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM); Six Sigma;
D O I
10.2991/ijcis.2010.3.5.10
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selecting an appropriate six sigma project is one of the most important problems for a manufacturing company because it impacts the manufacturing costs. Besides, an appropriate choice of Six Sigma projects is very important as it helps to improve quality, reduce variation, and eliminate waste of a manufacturing system. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to provide a good insight into the use of an integrated decision-making methodology in the evaluation of Six Sigma projects. For this purpose, we integrate three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods by applying a modified Delphi method, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) methodologies. After the evaluation criteria of Six Sigma projects are determined by a Modified Delphi method, the weights of criteria are calculated by applying the AHP method. The FTOPSIS method is then employed to achieve the final ranking results. A real case application along with a sensitivity analysis is presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The research question for this methodology is how we can develop an integrated MCDM model to select six sigma projects. © 2010, the authors.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 621
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Kaufmann A., Gupta M.M., Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, (1985)
[2]  
Gumus A.T., Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Transportation Firms by Using a Two Step Fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS Methodology, Expert Syst Appl., 36, 2, pp. 4067-4074, (2009)
[3]  
Adams C., Gupta P., Wilson C., Six Sigma Deployment, (2003)
[4]  
Kahraman C., Tolga A.C., An Alternative Ranking Approach and Its Usage in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Int J Comput Intelligence Syst, 2, 3, pp. 219-235, (2009)
[5]  
Hendricks C.A., Kelbaugh R.L., Implementing Six Sigma at GE, J for Qual and Partici., 21, 4, pp. 48-53, (1998)
[6]  
Hwang C.L., Yoon K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, (1981)
[7]  
Wu C.R., Lin C.T., Lin Y.F., Selecting the Preferable Bancassurance Alliance Strategic By Using Expert Group Decision Technique, Expert Syst Appl., 36, 2, pp. 3623-3629, (2009)
[8]  
Chen C.T., Extensions of the TOPSIS for group Decision Making under Fuzzy Environment, Fuzzy Set Syst, 114, 1, pp. 1-9, (2000)
[9]  
Su C.T., Chou C.J., A systematic methodology for the creation of Six Sigma projects: A case study of semiconductor foundry, Expert Syst Appl., 34, 4, pp. 2693-2703, (2008)
[10]  
Chang C.W., Wu C.R., Chen H.C., Using Expert Technology to Select Unstable Slicing Machine to Control Wafer Slicing Quality Via Fuzzy AHP, Expert Syst Appl., 34, pp. 2210-2220, (2008)