Study of the Choice of Excitation Frequency for Sub Surface Defect Detection in Electrically Thick Conducting Specimen Using Eddy Current Testing

被引：0
作者：
Mahesh Raja Perumal
Krishnan Balasubramaniam
Kavitha Arunachalam
机构：
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Madras,Electromagnetic Research Laboratory, Department of Engineering Design
[2] Indian Institute of Technology Madras,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Non
来源：
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation | 2018年 / 37卷
关键词：
Conducting specimen; Eddy current testing; Sub surface defect; Thick plate;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Understanding the scope and limitations of non-destructive testing procedure is essential for selecting the appropriate test parameters for material inspection. This paper presents the scope of material (δs\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \delta_{s} $$\end{document}) and probe dependent (δt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \delta_{t} $$\end{document}) penetration depths for determining the optimal test frequency (fopt)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ f_{opt} ) $$\end{document} for detection of sub surface defects in electrically thick conducting specimens. Numerical modelling is carried out for a pancake coil above an electrically thick aluminium plate, t/δt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ t/\delta_{t} $$\end{document} > 1, to study the influence of the EC probe and defect location (tdf\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ t_{df} $$\end{document}) on the test frequency for near and deep sub surface defects. The study concludes that the optimal test frequency, fopt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ f_{opt} $$\end{document} for detection of deep sub surface defects (tdf/t≈1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ t_{df} /t \approx 1 $$\end{document}) is determined by the probe dependent skin depth, δt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \delta_{t} $$\end{document}, and the plate thickness is related to fopt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ f_{opt} $$\end{document} by, t∝1/fopt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ t \propto 1/\sqrt {f_{opt} } $$\end{document}. The numerical observations were experimentally validated for machined sub surface notches on a 10 mm thick (t\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ t $$\end{document}) aluminium plate.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Capobianco TE(1990)Eddy current probe sensitivity as a function of coil construction parameters Res. Nondestr. Eval. 2 169-186
  • [2] Splett JD(2013)Fast analytical modeling of eddy current non-destructive testing of magnetic material J. Nondestr. Eval. 32 294-299
  • [3] Iyer HK(2013)Novel coupled electric field method for defect characterization in eddy current non-destructive testing systems J. Nondestr. Eval. 33 471-480
  • [4] Bouchala T(2014)Eddy current testing and evaluation of far-side corrosion around rivet in jet-engine intake of aging supersonic aircraft J. Nondestr. Eval. 31 99-107
  • [5] Abdelhadi B(2011)Evaluation of equibiaxial compressive stress introduced into austenitic stainless steel using an eddy current method J. Nondestr. Eval. 31 349-356
  • [6] Benoudjit A(2012)Development of an eddy current inspection technique with surface magnetization to evaluate the carburization thickness of ethylene pyrolysis furnace tubes J. Nondestr. Eval. 32 286-293
  • [7] Bouchala T(2013)Magnetic nondestructive test for resistance spot welds using magnetic flux penetration and eddy current methods J. Nondestr. Eval. 6 1511-1517
  • [8] Abdelhadi B(2006)Performance of magnetic pulsed-eddy-current system using high dynamic and high linearity improved Giant Magneto-Resistance (GMR) Magnetometer IEEE Sens. J. 226 69-75
  • [9] Benoudjit A(2015)Optimisation of pulsed eddy current probe for detection of sub-surface defects in stainless steel plates Sens. Actuators, A 43 606-614
  • [10] Kim J(2010)Source separation techniques applied to the detection of subsurface defects in the eddy current NDT of aeronautical lap-joints NDT E Int. 4602 1-10
1234567