Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular therapy compared with endovascular therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Yingying Sun
Zhen-Ni Guo
Xiuli Yan
Meiqi Wang
Peng Zhang
Haiqiang Qin
Yan Wang
Hongjing Zhu
Yi Yang
机构
[1] The First Hospital of Jilin University,Neuroscience Center & Clinical Trial and Research Center for Stroke, Department of Neurology
[2] Capital Medical University,Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
来源
Neuroradiology | 2021年 / 63卷
关键词
Tirofiban; Acute ischemic stroke; Endovascular treatment; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been widely used for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the safety and efficacy of treating AIS with tirofiban combined with EVT remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate this treatment. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared treatment with tirofiban combined with EVT and EVT alone were included in our meta-analysis. Those published from inception to March 31, 2020, were searched using the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Safety was assessed based on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence and 3-month mortality. Efficacy was assessed based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months post-EVT and recanalization rates. Data were analyzed using either the random-effects or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity of studies. In total, one RCT, six prospective studies, and four retrospective studies (2387 AIS cases) were assessed. Our meta-analysis showed that tirofiban combined with EVT did not increase sICH risk (RR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.42; P = 0.72) and 3-month mortality (RR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P = 0.12). Recanalization rates were not significantly different between patients treated with tirofiban combined with EVT and those treated with EVT alone (RR, 1.04; 95%CI, 1.00 to 1.08; P = 0.07), but tirofiban combined with EVT was significantly associated with favorable functional outcomes (mRS score, 0–2) in AIS patients (RR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.02 to 1.25; P = 0.02). Tirofiban combined with EVT appears to be safe and potentially effective in treating AIS.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:8
相关论文
共 629 条
[1]  
Vos T(2012)Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 Lancet 380 2163-2196
[2]  
Flaxman AD(2019)Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke 50 e344-e418
[3]  
Naghavi M(2015)Endothelial trauma from mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: in vitro live-cell platform with animal validation Stroke 46 1099-1106
[4]  
Lozano R(2006)Conformation-specific blockade of the integrin GPIIb/IIIa: a novel antiplatelet strategy that selectively targets activated platelets Circ Res 99 25-33
[5]  
Michaud C(2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 339 b2700-1329
[6]  
Ezzati M(2008)Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke N Engl J Med 359 1317-131
[7]  
Shibuya K(1999)Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Neurology 53 126-605
[8]  
Salomon JA(2010)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses Eur J Epidemiol 25 603-560
[9]  
Abdalla S(2003)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 557-634
[10]  
Aboyans V(1997)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 315 629-1455