Vasodilatory edema: A common side effect of antihypertensive therapy

被引:88
作者
Messerli F.H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA 70121
关键词
Calcium Antagonist; Amlodipine; Felodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Blocker; Minoxidil;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-002-0110-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Vasodilatory edema, a common adverse effect of antihypertensive therapy with vasodilators, is related to several mechanisms, including arteriolar dilatation (causing an increase in intracapillary pressure), stimulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and fluid volume retention. Vasodilatory edema is dosedependent and most common with direct arteriolar dilators such as minoxidil or hydralazine, and in decreasing order of frequency with the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, ?-blockers, antiadrenergic drugs, and nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Not all dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are created equal with regard to vasodilatory edema. At an equal antihypertensive efficacy, lercanidipine and lacidipine are associated with less vasodilatory edema than amlodipine and nifedipine. The addition of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist significantly reduces vasodilatory edema. In contrast, the addition of a diuretic has little effect on vasodilatory edema. Thus, low-dose combination therapy (of a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with either an ACE inhibitor or an ARB) may be preferred over high-dose monotherapy. Copyright © 2002 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 482
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Schrier R.W., Pathogenesis of sodium and water retention in high-output and low-output cardiac failure, nephrotic syndrome, cirrhosis, and pregnancy (1), N Engl J Med, 319, pp. 1065-1072, (1988)
[2]  
Epstein M., Natriuretic effect, CV Drug Rev, 9, pp. 399-413, (1991)
[3]  
Messerli F.H., Feng Z., Vasodilatory edema: Synergistic effect of high-dose calcium antagonist/ace inhibitor combination therapy [abstract], Am J Hypertens, 12, (1999)
[4]  
Zanchetti A., Omboni S., La Commare P., Et al., Efficacy, tolerability, and impact on quality of life of long-term treatment with manidipine or amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 38, pp. 642-650, (2001)
[5]  
Fogari R., Malamani G.D., Zoppi A., Et al., Comparative effect of lercanidipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system on ankle volume and subcutaneous interstitial pressure in hypertensive patients: A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, Curr Ther Res, 61, pp. 851-862, (2000)
[6]  
Leonetti G., Magnani B., Pessina A.C., Et al., Tolerability of long-term treatment with lercanidipine vs. Amlodipine and lacidipine in elderly hypertensives, Am J Hypertens, (2002)
[7]  
Weir M.R., Rosenberger C., Fink J.C., Pilot study to evaluate a water displacement technique to compare effects of diuretics and ace inhibitors to alleviate lower extremity edema due to dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, Am J Hypertens, 14, 9 PART 1, pp. 963-968, (2001)
[8]  
Messerli F.H., Oparil S., Feng Z., Comparison of efficacy and side effects of combination therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (benazepril) with calcium antagonist (either nifedipine or amlodipine) versus high-dose calcium antagonist monotherapy for systemic hypertension, Am J Cardiol, 86, pp. 1182-1187, (2000)
[9]  
The sixth report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure, Arch Intern Med, 157, pp. 2413-2446, (1997)