Fostering creative performance in art and design education via self-regulated learning

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey A. Greene
Rebekah Freed
R. Keith Sawyer
机构
[1] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
来源
Instructional Science | 2019年 / 47卷
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Creativity; Art and design education; Qualitative research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is a lack of research and practice focused on how to foster higher-order processing, such as creative performance, within higher education settings. To address this gap in research, we chose to study pedagogical practices in schools of art and design, where one of the intended learning outcomes is creativity. Based upon data gathered as part of a larger study (Sawyer in Thinking Skills and Creativity, http://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2018.08.002, 2018), we found that among a large number of creative performance pedagogical practices we identified, a subset seemed to foster self-regulated learning (SRL). Therefore, the goal of our study was to identify the ways art and design professors enacted practices that foster their students’ self-regulation during learning and performance. We found these professors utilized a number of direct and indirect methods of fostering their students’ SRL, all intended to enhance students’ ability to enact creative performance. In addition to revealing interesting comparisons between SRL in art and design and other more commonly studied contexts such as science or history, our findings suggested numerous directions for expanding SRL models, including a greater focus on process as the outcome of SRL, a need to continue research into SRL during higher-order processing, and gaps regarding the development of SRL.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 149
页数:22
相关论文
共 120 条
[21]  
Walck CC(2010)Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning Computers & Education 54 230-69
[22]  
Nunnery JA(2015)Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history Contemporary Educational Psychology 42 111-869
[23]  
Cleary T(2012)Investigating how college students’ task definitions and plans relate to self-regulated learning processing and understanding of a complex science topic Contemporary Educational Psychology 37 307-145
[24]  
Zimmerman BJ(2014)Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning Computers & Education 76 55-504
[25]  
De Corte E(2016)What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mindsets? Not their parents’ view of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure Psychological Science 27 859-219
[26]  
Verschaffel L(1994)Making space: A comparison of mathematical work in school and professional design practices The Sociological Review 42 118-94
[27]  
Masui C(2014)The maker movement in education Harvard Educational Review 84 495-171
[28]  
Dent AL(2015)Understanding the process of motivational, emotional and cognitive regulation in learning situations Educational Psychologist 50 204-298
[29]  
Koenka AC(1997)Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes Educational Technology, Research, and Development 45 65-560
[30]  
Dinsmore DL(2010)Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance Metacognition and Learning 5 157-25