Practice makes perfect: Practice engagement theory and the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency

被引:0
作者
Stephen Reder
Britta Gauly
Clemens Lechner
机构
[1] Portland State University,
[2] GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences,undefined
来源
International Review of Education | 2020年 / 66卷
关键词
adult; literacy; numeracy; proficiency; practices; Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC); longitudinal data;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Practice engagement theory (PET) posits that individuals’ literacy proficiencies develop as a by-product of their engagement in everyday reading and writing practices and, reciprocally, that literacy proficiencies affect levels of engagement in reading and writing practices. This suggests that literacy training which increases engagement in meaningful practices might generate proficiency growth. Research has shown that this approach does indeed seem to be effective in improving (adult) learners’ literacy proficiency. A number of cross-sectional comparisons of participants’ and non-participants’ performance in various training activities, as well as quantitative modelling of adults’ proficiency growth in longitudinal studies have confirmed the theoretical assumptions of PET. The authors of this article describe the first application of PET to literacy and numeracy development in a longitudinal study of a nationally representative adult population. Their investigation followed a sample of adults initially interviewed and assessed in the German component of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), adding longitudinal data from three additional waves of the national extension study (PIAAC-L), which included repeated assessments of literacy and numeracy proficiency over a period of three years. The authors’ quantitative modelling of the growth of literacy and numeracy proficiency over time provides strong support for PET. Their comparisons of how various practice engagement indexes predict growth of literacy and numeracy proficiencies indicate that reading engagement is the strongest predictor of literacy growth and maths engagement is the strongest predictor of numeracy growth. The authors conclude their article by considering their findings’ implications for sustainable development, lifelong learning policy and future research into the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 288
页数:21
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Billett S(2004)Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments Journal of Workplace Learning 16 312-324
  • [2] Edin P-A(2008)Time out of work and skill depreciation Industrial and Labor Relations Review 61 163-180
  • [3] Gustavsson M(2019)The determinants of skills use and work pressure: A longitudinal analysis Economic and Industrial Democracy 40 730-754
  • [4] Felstead A(2016)Partial credit model: Estimations and tests of fit with pcmodel Stata Journal 16 464-481
  • [5] Gallie D(2015)Direct participation and employee learning at work Work and Occupations 42 447-475
  • [6] Green F(1982)A Rasch model for partial credit scoring Psychometrika 47 149-174
  • [7] Henseke G(2002)Impact of authentic adult literacy instruction on adult literacy practices Reading Research Quarterly 37 70-92
  • [8] Hamel J-F(2019)Numeracy imprisoned: Skills and practices of incarcerated adults in the United States ZDM Mathematics Education (online first) 35 226-243
  • [9] Challet-Bouju G(2000)Does basic skills education affect adults’ literacy proficiencies and reading practices? Reading Research Quarterly 8 8-20
  • [10] Sebille V(2014)Learning conditions at work: A framework to understand and assess informal learning in the workplace International Journal of Training and Development 31 196-219