Therapeutic profile of manidipine and lercanidipine in hypertensive patients

被引:0
作者
Edoardo Casiglia
Alberto Mazza
Valérie Tikhonoff
Giancarlo Basso
Bortolo Martini
Roberta Scarpa
Achille Cesare Pessina
机构
[1] University of Padova,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
[2] General Hospital of Schio,Division of Cardiology
来源
Advances in Therapy | 2004年 / 21卷
关键词
manidipine; lercanidipine; clinical trial; hypertension; plethysmography; circulation; vasodilator;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Manidipine and lercanidipine are considered effective and safe in the treatment of chronic arterial hypertension and are equipotent in reducing blood pressure (BP) levels. Their main side effect is ankle-foot edema. After a 2-week placebo runin period, these 2 drugs were compared in a controlled parallel-group study lasting 3 months, involving 53 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (26 assigned to manidipine and 27 to lercanidipine). At the end of the active treatment period, BP was significantly reduced in comparison with the end of the placebo phase in both the manidipine and the lercanidipine groups, without significant differences between the 2 drugs. Daytime BP was significantly reduced by 5.5%/5.6% with manidipine and by 3.8%/6.6% with lercanidipine, while smaller reductions were seen at nighttime. The smoothness index was the same with both drugs. Unlike lercanidipine, manidipine significantly reduced both basal (-30%) and minimal vascular resistance (-39%), qualifying it as a potent vasodilator. Despite vasodilation, heart rate was not increased but was even slightly reduced by treatment. Ankle-foot edema was observed with both drugs but was less pronounced with manidipine, probably because of greater postcapillary dilatation. In conclusion, manidipine and lercanidipine are both effective and safe in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, although the former seems to have a more favorable tolerability profile than the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 369
页数:12
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Borghi C(2003)Improved tolerability of the dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist lercanidipine: the lercanidipine challenge trial Blood Pressure 12 14-21
  • [2] Prandin MG(2000)Lercanidipine: a review of its use in hypertension Drugs 60 1123-1140
  • [3] Dormi A(1996)Diverse effects of calcium antagonists on glomerular haemodynamics Kidney Int 55 S132-S134
  • [4] Ambrosini E(2000)Effect of calcium antagonists on glomerular arterioles in spontaneously hypertensive rats Hypertension 35 775-779
  • [5] McClellan KJ(1997)The natriuretic effect of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system remains despite the presence of mild-to-moderate renal failure J Hypertens 15 1803-1808
  • [6] Jarvis B(1999)Antiplatelet effect of amlodipine: a possible mechanism through a nitric oxide-mediated process Biochem Pharmacol 58 1657-1663
  • [7] Arima S(1997)Cardiovascular care with the new T-type calcium channel antagonist: possible role of attendant sympathetic nervous system inhibition J Hypertens Suppl 15 S3-S7
  • [8] Ito S(2002)Effects of calcium channel blockers on atherosclerosis: new insights Acta Cardiol 57 249-255
  • [9] Omata K(1999)Vascular-selective effect of lercanidipine and other 1,4-dihydropyridines in isolated rabbit tissues J Pharm Pharmacol 51 709-714
  • [10] Tsunoda K(2002)Calcium antagonists in hypertension: from hemodynamics to outcomes Am J Hypertens 15 94S-97S