Governance typology of universities’ technology transfer processes

被引:1
作者
Anja Schoen
Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
Joachim Henkel
机构
[1] Technische Universität München,TUM School of Management
[2] Université libre de Bruxelles,Solvay S.A. Chair of Innovation, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management
[3] Université Libre de Bruxelles,International Centre for Innovation, Technology and Education Studies (iCite), Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management
[4] Université Libre de Bruxelles,European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management
[5] Université Libre de Bruxelles,Centre Emile Bernheim, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management
[6] Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR),undefined
来源
The Journal of Technology Transfer | 2014年 / 39卷
关键词
Technology transfer offices; Organizational structure; Governance; Academic patents; L30; O31; O32; O34;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the growing interest in university-to-industry technology transfer, there are very few studies on the governance of universities’ technology transfer offices (TTOs). The few existing ones tend to focus on US universities and generally tackle one dimension of the governance. The present paper aims at contributing to this literature in two ways. First, it takes into account the diversity of organizational models with a theoretical perspective: the paper presents a discussion on which combinations of four structural dimensions should yield viable configurations. Four main types of TTOs are identified: (1) classical TTO; (2) autonomous TTO; (3) discipline-integrated Technology Transfer Alliance; and (4) discipline-specialized Technology Transfer Alliance. Second, the paper relies on 16 case studies of universities located in six European countries in order to address the pros and cons of the four types of TTOs. The results provide both a conceptual understanding and an empirical overview of how universities organize their technology transfer and intellectual property management.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 453
页数:18
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Belenzon S(2009)University knowledge transfer: Private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives Journal of Law and Economics 52 111-144
  • [2] Schankerman M(2001)Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behavior: An exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State universities Journal of Technology Transfer 26 21-35
  • [3] Bercovitz J(2000)University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions Journal of Business Venturing 15 385-392
  • [4] Feldman M(2005)Assessing the relative performance of U.K. University technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence Research Policy 34 369-384
  • [5] Feller I(1972)Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice Sociology 6 2-22
  • [6] Burton R(2005)Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions Journal of Business Venturing 20 183-216
  • [7] Bray MJ(2009)Is the US outperforming Europe in university technology licensing? A new perspective on the European paradox Research Policy 40 123-135
  • [8] Lee JN(2005)The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links Research Policy 34 321-342
  • [9] Chapple W(2003)Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy 32 209-227
  • [10] Lockett A(1989)Building theories from case study research Academy of Management Review 14 532-550