Risk models used to counsel women for breast and ovarian cancer: A guide for clinicians

被引:21
作者
Claus E.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8034
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast Cancer; Ovarian Cancer; Cancer Risk; Genetic Counseling; Breast Cancer Risk;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021135807900
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advances in the identification and treatment of breast and ovarian cancer have lead to a need for reliable estimates of susceptibility risk associated with these two cancers. These estimates may be used in clinical settings to identify individuals at increased risk of developing disease or of being a carrier of a disease susceptibility allele. Accurate assessment of these probabilities is important given the potential implications for medical decision-making including the identification of patients who might benefit from preventive measures, genetic counseling or from entry into clinical trials. A wide range of empirical and statistical models has been proposed, particularly for breast cancer risk prediction, including those that utilize logistic regression or Bayesian modeling. The specific data used to create the various risk models also varies and may include molecular, epidemiologic, or clinical information. This overview presents definitions of risk used in clinical oncology as well as several of the more frequently used methods of risk estimation for breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the means by which different methods are able to provide a measure of error or uncertainty associated with a given risk estimate will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 206
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hilsenbeck S.G., Wenger C.R., Reynolds L.P., Et al., Early results of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility, Br Cancer Res Treat, 46, (1997)
  • [42] Hiller E.H., Parmigiani G., Berry D.A., Et al., Validity testing of a computer model for calculating carrier probabilities of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, 1997, Meeting of the ASHG
  • [43] Benichou J., Gail M.H., Estimates of absolute cause-specific risk in cohort studies, Biometrics, 46, pp. 813-826, (1990)
  • [44] Benichou J., Gail M.H., Methods of inference for estimates of absolute risk derived from population-based case-control studies, Biometrics, 51, pp. 182-194, (1995)
  • [45] Benichou J., Gail M., Mulvihill J.J., Graphs to estimate an individualized risk of breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 14, pp. 103-110, (1996)
  • [46] Hoskins K.F., Stopfer J.E., Calzone K.A., Et al., Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer: A guide for clinicians, JAMA, 273, pp. 577-585, (1995)
  • [47] McTiernan A., Gilligan M.A., Redmond C., Assessing individual risk for breast cancer: Risky business, J Clin Epidemiol, 50, pp. 547-556, (1997)
  • [48] Offit K., Brown K., Quantitating familial cancer risk: A resource for clinical oncologists, J Clin Oncol, 12, pp. 1724-1736, (1994)
  • [49] Biesecker B.B., Boehnke M., Calzone K., Et al., Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer, JAMA, 269, pp. 1970-1974, (1993)
  • [50] Parmigiani G., Berry D.A., Iversen E., Et al., Modeling risk of breast cancer and decisions about genetic testing, Fourth Workshop on Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, (1997)