Bivariate simulation of river flow using hybrid intelligent models in sub-basins of Lake Urmia, Iran

被引:0
作者
Vahed Eslamitabar
Farshad Ahmadi
Ahmad Sharafati
Vahid Rezaverdinejad
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch
[2] Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering
[3] Urmia University,Department of Water Engineering
来源
Acta Geophysica | 2023年 / 71卷
关键词
Ant lion; Conditional variance; Heteroscedasticity; Random forest; Support vector regression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, the performance of continuous autoregressive moving average (CARMA), CARMA-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (CARMA-GARCH), random forest, support vector regression and ant colony optimization (SVR-ACO), and support vector regression and ant lion optimizer (SVR-ALO) models in bivariate simulating of discharge based on the rainfall variables in monthly time scale was evaluated over four sub-basins of Lake Urmia, located in northwestern Iran. The models were assessed in two stages: train and test. The results showed that the CARMA-GARCH hybrid model offered better performance in all cases than the stand-alone CARMA. The improvement percentages of the error rate in the CARMA model compared to the CARMA-GARCH hybrid model in the Mahabad Chai, Nazlu Chai, Siminehrood, and Zola Chai sub-basins were 9, 20, 17, and 6.4%, respectively, in the training phase. Among the models, the hybrid SVR models integrated with ACO and ALO optimization algorithms presented the best performance based on the Taylor diagram and evaluation criteria. Considering the use of ant colony and ant lion optimization algorithms to optimize the support vector regression model’s parameters, these models offered the best performance in the study area to simulate the discharge. The improvement percentages of the error rate in the SVR-ACO model compared to the CARMA-GARCH hybrid model in the Mahabad Chai, Nazlu Chai, Siminehrood, and Zola Chai sub-basins were 11, 10, 19, and 21%, respectively, in the training phase. In contrast, the random forest model provided the lowest accuracy and the highest error in discharge simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 892
页数:19
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Afan HA(2020)Input attributes optimization using the feasibility of genetic nature inspired algorithm: application of river flow forecasting Sci Rep 10 1-15
[2]  
Allawi MF(2022)Coupled online sequential extreme learning machine model with ant colony optimization algorithm for wheat yield prediction Sci Rep 12 1-23
[3]  
El-Shafie A(2005)Evaluation of neural network streamflow forecasting on 47 watersheds J Hydrol Eng 10 85-88
[4]  
Yaseen ZM(2022)Watershed-scale risk to aquatic organisms from complex chemical mixtures in the Shenandoah River Environ Sci Technol 56 845-861
[5]  
Ahmed AN(2021)Presence and fate of microplastics in the water sources: focus on the role of wastewater and drinking water treatment plants J Water Process Eng 40 5-59
[6]  
Malek MA(1992)ARCH modeling in finance: a review of the theory and empirical evidence J Econom 52 5-32
[7]  
Koting SB(2022)Quantifying flow–ecology relationships across flow regime class and ecoregions in South Carolina Sci Total Environ 802 567-576
[8]  
Salih SQ(2001)Random forests Mach Learn 45 294-306
[9]  
Mohtar WHMW(2012)Daily streamflow modelling using autoregressive moving average and artificial neural networks models: case study of Çoruh basin, Turkey Water Environ J 26 1-8
[10]  
Lai SH(2009)A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series J Hydrol 3 1-19