How Corporate Social Performance Is Institutionalised Within the Governance StructureThe Dutch Corporate Governance Model

被引:0
作者
Frank J. de Graaf
Cor A. J. Herkströter
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Corporate Responsibility Foundation
[2] Amsterdam Business School,undefined
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2007年 / 74卷
关键词
corporate governance; corporate social performance; stakeholder influence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since Ackerman in Corporate social responsiveness, the modern dilemma (1973), pleaded for the institutionalisation of corporate social performance (CSP) in business processes, researchers have focused on the role of strategy in CSP. This article demonstrates that CSP is institutionalised within the governance structure. We will attempt to make this clear by means of a description of the Dutch system of corporate governance. Under certain circumstances Dutch companies are already bound to CSP due to prevailing legislation. A governance perspective shows that CSP is institutionalised within a company’s governance structure. “Processes of responsiveness”, since long regarded as a starting point of CSP-analysis, appear to be decision-making processes. Within these processes the expectations of the stakeholders can be institutionalised, trust can be built and interests can be incorporated. This makes CSP context-dependent. However, it is possible to analyse companies by comparing the companies’ individual governance structures. The article concludes that CSP-analysis can fruitfully extend into analysing in the role of the stakeholders in the influence-pathways that are incorporated within the governance structure.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 189
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Berman S.(2000)A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance Business and Society 39 397-418
[2]  
Rowley T.(2005)Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems: A Convenantal Approach of Building Trust Journal of Business Ethics 58 249-259
[3]  
Caldwell C.(1998)Board Diversity and Managerial Control as Predictors of Corporate Social Performance Journal of Business Ethics 17 1593-1603
[4]  
Karri R.(2002)Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks Journal of Business Ethics 41 81-98
[5]  
Coffey B. S.(1997)Toward a Stewardship Theory of the Firm Academy of Management Review 22 20-47
[6]  
Wang J.(1993)Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance California Management Review 25 88-106
[7]  
Daboub A. J.(1999)Stakeholder Influence Strategies Academy of Management Review 24 191-205
[8]  
Calton J. M.(1993)Two-Step Leverage: Managing Constraint in Organizational Politics Administrative Science Quarterly 38 1-19
[9]  
Davis J. H.(1997)Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models Journal of Management and Governance 1 29-47
[10]  
Schoorman F. D.(2000)Corporate Social Performance, Research Directions for the 21st Century Business and Society 39 479-491