Mathematics and science education research against the audit culture

被引:0
作者
Tsatsaroni A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Social and Education Policy, University of the Peloponnese
关键词
Mathematics Education; Education Research; Educational Study; Mathematics Education Research; Science Education Research;
D O I
10.1007/s10763-006-9042-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Effective efforts that seek basic reforms of our policies and practices in curriculum, teaching, and evaluation are only as strong as their understanding of the relations between schools and the larger society. Mathematical and scientific knowledge is not just any knowledge. It performs specific functions currently Y functions that are tied to the kind of economy that we have, the unequal pattern of benefits generated by this economy, and the distribution of social and economic power that supports this structure. Technical/administrative knowledge and the importance of its production, accumulation, control, and use may contradict a proposal for widespread distribution of such knowledge. The return on investments of capital in education may not be worth the cost in the eyes of the business community. Thus in the absence of a recognition of the larger social functions of the knowledge itself, any call for a curriculum that is based on a wider distribution of mathematical knowledge that involves expensive changes in resources and time (and that may interfere with more elitist uses of the knowledge) is vulnerable unless it participates in much larger efforts to transform the use and control of Knowledge in more democratic directions. © National Science Council, Taiwan 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 193
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Apple M., Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education, Power, Meaning and Identity. Essays in Critical Educational Studies, pp. 85-111, (1999)
[2]  
Beck J., Young M., The assault on the professions and the restructuring of academic and professional identities: A Bernsteinian analysis, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 2, pp. 183-197, (2005)
[3]  
Bernstein B., On the classification and framing of educational knowledge, Knowledge and Control. New Directions for the Sociology of Education, pp. 47-69, (1971)
[4]  
Bernstein B., Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 2, pp. 157-173, (1999)
[5]  
Bernstein B., Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique Revised Edition, (2000)
[6]  
Goodson I., The educational researcher as a public intellectual, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 3, pp. 277-299, (1999)
[7]  
Lerman S., Theories of Mathematics Education: Is plurality a problem?, Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 38, 1, pp. 8-13, (2006)
[8]  
Lerman S., Xu G., Tsatsaroni A., Developing theories of mathematics education research: The ESM story, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, pp. 23-40, (2002)
[9]  
Martin I., Adult Education, lifelong learning and citizenship: Some ifs and buts, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22, 6, pp. 566-579, (2002)
[10]  
Towards A Sociology of Pedagogy. the Contribution of Basil Bernstein to Research, (2001)