Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification in general medical patients at an academic medical center

被引:0
|
作者
Megan Kunka Fritz
Scott E. Kincaid
Charles G. Sargent
Amanda H. Green
George A. Davis
机构
[1] University of Kentucky HealthCare,Pharmacy Department
[2] University of Kentucky HealthCare,Division of Hospital Medicine
[3] University of Kentucky HealthCare,Department of Nursing
[4] University of Kentucky HealthCare,Pharmacy Department
来源
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | 2021年 / 51卷
关键词
Venous thromboembolism; Classification; Risk factors; Low molecular weight heparin; Heparin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still a concern for general medical patients. Pharmacologic prophylaxis can reduce VTE incidence, but there is the potential for adverse effects. Therefore, determining which patients should receive VTE prophylaxis via risk scoring tools is essential. Limited evidence exists for the ideal venous thromboembolism risk assessment model (RAM) in hospitalized medical patients, as compared to other hospitalized patient subgroups such as surgical patients. The primary objective was to investigate the utilization and appropriateness of our institution-based VTE RAM and comparison to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS). This would allow for a gauge of provider risk assessment accuracy as well as appropriate predictive potential of the PPS or whether an alternative to the PPS should be considered. A total of 330 adult general medicine patients were included in this retrospective chart review. When compared to our institution-based VTE RAM, providers predominately stratified patients at a higher VTE risk than the institution-based VTE RAM. VTE incidence was 0.3%, which was lower than predicted. Significant discordance exists between providers’ VTE risk assessment and that predicted by RAMs. Our institution-based VTE RAM appears comparable to PPS; however, it was not being utilized by providers, resulting in potentially unnecessary use of pharmacologic prophylaxis. The most appropriate venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for general medicine patients is undetermined.Our providers generally assess patients as moderate or high VTE risk, despite our institution-based RAM which typically recommends a lower risk category than provider selection.Because of provider risk assessment, more patients received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis than would have been recommended by the RAM, which might correlate to the low incidence of VTE which was < 0.5%, although bleeding complications were not assessed in this study.A prospective study utilizing the Padua Prediction Score (or similar RAM) in general medicine patients is warranted in order to decipher the best method of predicting VTE risk.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients: Future perspectives
    Imberti, D
    Prisco, D
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2005, 116 (05) : 365 - 375
  • [22] Stratification of venous thromboembolism risk in burn patients by Caprini score
    Li, Quan
    Ba, Te
    Wang, Ling-Feng
    Chen, Qiang
    Li, Fang
    Xue, Yuan
    BURNS, 2019, 45 (01) : 140 - 145
  • [23] Risk stratification for the development of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer
    Parker, A.
    Peterson, E.
    Lee, A. Y. Y.
    de Wit, C.
    Carrier, M.
    Polley, G.
    Tien, J.
    Wu, C.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2018, 16 (07) : 1321 - 1326
  • [24] A new risk assessment model for the stratification of the thromboembolism risk in medical patients: the TEVere Score
    Vincentelli, Giovanni M.
    Timpone, Sergio
    Murdolo, Giuseppe
    Fusco Moffa, Igino
    L'angiocola, Paolo D.
    Borgognoni, Francesco
    Monti, Manuel
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2018, 109 (06) : 436 - 442
  • [25] Validation of Risk Assessment Models of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
    Greene, M. Todd
    Spyropoulos, Alex C.
    Chopra, Vineet
    Grant, Paul J.
    Kaatz, Scott
    Bernstein, Steven J.
    Flanders, Scott A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 129 (09) : 1001.e9 - 1001.e18
  • [26] Scoring Systems for Estimating Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
    Barbar, Sofia
    Prandoni, Paolo
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2017, 43 (05) : 460 - 468
  • [27] Risk factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Thai hospitalised medical patients
    Rojnuckarin, Ponlapat
    Uaprasert, Noppacharn
    Vajragupta, Laddawan
    Numkarunarunrote, Numphung
    Tanpowpong, Nathaporn
    Sutcharitchan, Pranee
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 106 (06) : 1103 - 1108
  • [28] Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in general surgical patients
    Vaughan, P
    Gardner, J
    Peters, F
    Wilmott, R
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 4 (11): : 1037 - 1039
  • [29] Association of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with clinically relevant bleeding and hospital-acquired anemia in medical inpatients: the risk stratification for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in medical patients study
    Choffat, Damien
    Rossel, Jean-Benoit
    Aujesky, Drahomir
    Vollenweider, Peter
    Baumgartner, Christine
    Mean, Marie
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 22 (03) : 765 - 774
  • [30] Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients and outpatients
    Stashenko, Gregg J.
    Tapson, Victor F.
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 6 (05) : 356 - 363