Peripheral bone density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

被引:0
作者
Helmut Franck
Jurgen Gottwalt
机构
[1] Schwerpunktpraxis für Rheumatologie/Endokrinologie,
[2] Rheumazentrum Oberammergau,undefined
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Bone densitometry; Disease activity; Forearm; Rheumatoid arthritis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) varies at different skeletal sites. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm is significantly different in patients with RA and controls and may correlate to BMD or other parameters of inflammation or bone resorption. We included 421 patients (357 women: mean age 58.4 ± 12.87 years and 64 men: mean age 56.11 ± 12.80 years) with RA in the study. BMD values of the ultradistal forearm (0.381 ± 0.052 g/cm2) and middistal forearm (0.519 ± 0.091 g/cm2) were significantly (p < 0.01) lower in women with RA than controls (0.395 ± 0.043 and 0.535 ± 0.052 g/cm2, respectively). In contrast, there was no difference in bone density at the lumbar spine (women 0.921 ± 0.l570 g/cm2, men 0.941 ± 0.144 g/cm2) or hip (women 08.11 ± 0.140 g/cm2, men 0.895 ± 0.143 g/cm2) in patients with RA in comparison to controls (lumbar spine: women 0.930 ± 0.146 g/cm2; men 0.960 ± 0.146 g/cm2; hip: women 0.820 ± 0.122 g/cm2; men 0.899 ± 0.144/cm2). Patients with increased inflammatory activity (elevated C-reactive protein) presented with significantly lower BMD of the hip (0.7533 ± 0.144 versus 0.825 ± 0.138 g/cm2) and ultradistal forearm (0.366 ± 0.09 versus 0.390 ± 0.07 g/cm2). This was not the case for the lumbar spine. BMD of the forearm is precise and, in contrast to BMD of the lumbar spine, significantly lower in patients with RA. It is related to inflammatory activity, grip strength, and treatment with glucocorticoids in patients with RA.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1145
页数:4
相关论文
共 149 条
[1]  
Arnett FC(1988)The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 31 315-324
[2]  
Edworthy SM(2006)The relation between joint erosion and generalized osteoporosis and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatol Int 26 896-899
[3]  
Bloch DA(2005)Digital radiogrammetry as a new diagnostic tool for estimation of disease-related osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis compared with pQCT Rheumatol Int 25 457-464
[4]  
McShane DJ(2003)Predictors of radiological progression and changes in hand bone density in early rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology (Oxford) 42 268-275
[5]  
Fries JF(2005)Comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR), and conventional radiographs in the evaluation of osteoporosis and bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Scand J Rheumatol 34 27-33
[6]  
Cooper NS(2006)Hand bone loss in early undifferentiated arthritis: evaluating bone mineral density loss before the development of rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis 65 736-740
[7]  
Healey LA(2002)Forearm bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis Calcif Tissue Int 70 1-8
[8]  
Kaplan SR(1995)Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement—comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density Calcif Tissue Int 56 192-195
[9]  
Liang MH(1997)Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design Calcif Tissue Int 61 445-447
[10]  
Luthra HS(1991)An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry J Nucl Med 32 2101-2106