Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: A case report

被引:21
作者
Weerasekera A. [1 ]
Wijesinghe P. [1 ]
Nugaduwa N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Base Hospital Wathupitiwala, Nittambuwa
关键词
Fistula; Intrauterine device; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Migration; Perforation;
D O I
10.1186/1752-1947-8-81
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The intrauterine device is a form of contraception with a long duration of action and few systemic side effects. Migration into the abdominal cavity may occur early or years after insertion giving rise to bowel obstruction, perforation, ischemia, mesenteric injury, strictures or fistulae. Colocolic fistula formation is a rare but serious complication of intrauterine device migration, which may lead to difficulties in diagnosis and device retrieval. Case presentation. We report the case of a 29-year-old Sri Lankan woman who became pregnant 5 years after intrauterine device insertion. The device could not be located during pregnancy. She was asymptomatic and defaulted follow up during the antenatal period. She had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. A subsequent laparotomy for device retrieval failed due to technical difficulties. A repeat laparotomy identified a sigmoid colocolic fistula with adhesions to the fallopian tube. The device was removed and colonic defects primarily closed following which the patient made an uneventful recovery. Conclusions: All translocated intrauterine devices should be removed regardless of type and location. This case illustrates that they may cause complex bowel lesions leading to serious technical difficulties during retrieval. With the increasing use of minimally invasive approaches for intrauterine device retrieval, a low threshold for open surgery in complicated cases is advocated. © 2014Weerasekera et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. ©2014 Weerasekera et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Arslan A., Kanat-Pektas M., Yesilyurt H., Bilge U., Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: A case report with literature review, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 279, pp. 395-397, (2009)
[2]  
Prabhu J.K., Rani R., Nayak N.K., Natarajan P., Migration of intrauterine contraceptive device into sigmoid colon, J ObstetGynaecol, 30, pp. 526-527, (2010)
[3]  
Tosun M., Celik H., Yavuz E., Cetinkaya M.B., Intravesical migration of an intrauterine device detected in a pregnant woman, Can Urol Assoc, 4, (2010)
[4]  
Andersson K., Ryde-Blomqvist E., Lindell K., Odlind V., Milsom I., Perforations with intrauterine devices: Report from a Swedish survey, Contraception, 57, 4, pp. 251-255, (1998)
[5]  
Gill R.S., Mok D., Hudson M., Shi X., Birch D.W., Karmali S., Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: Case and systematic review, Contraception, 85, pp. 15-18, (2012)
[6]  
Lyon A., Pandravada A., Leung E., Rae D., Emergency laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for perforation secondary to intrauterine contraceptive device, J Obstet Gynaecol, 32, pp. 402-403, (2012)
[7]  
Assarian A., Raja M.A.K., Colonoscopic retrieval of a lost intrauterine contraceptive device: A case report and review of articles, European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 10, 4, pp. 261-265, (2005)
[8]  
Pirwany I.R., Boddy K., Colocolic fistula caused by a previously inserted intrauterine device: Case report, Contraception, 56, 5, pp. 337-339, (1997)
[9]  
Berger-Kulemann V., Einspieler H., Hachemian N., Prayer D., Trattnig S., Weber M., Ba-Ssalamah A., Magnetic field interactions of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: In vivo study, Korean J Radiol, 14, pp. 416-422, (2013)
[10]  
Mechanism of Action, Safety and Efficacy of Intrauterine Devices (WHO Technical Report Series No. 753), pp. 48-63, (1987)