Mapping wildfire evacuation vulnerability in the western US: The limits of infrastructure

被引:60
作者
Cova T.J. [1 ]
Theobald D.M. [2 ]
Norman III J.B. [2 ]
Siebeneck L.K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geography, Center for Natural and Technological Hazards, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
[2] Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
[3] Department of Public Administration, University of North Texas, Denton, TX
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Evacuation; Transportation; Wildfire;
D O I
10.1007/s10708-011-9419-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Residential development in fire-prone areas of the western United States is a growing concern. The steady addition of homes to this region places more people and property at risk each year. In many areas housing is increasing without commensurate improvements in the road network, particularly in regards to the number, capacity and arrangement of community exit roads. This results in steadily increasing minimum evacuation times, as each additional household contributes to potential evacuation travel-demand in a wildfire. The goal of this research is to perform a comprehensive geographic search of the western U. S. for communities in wildfire-prone areas that may represent difficult evacuations due to constrained egress. The problem is formulated as a spatial search for fire-prone communities with a high ratio of households-to-exits and solved using methods in spatial optimization and geographic information systems (GIS). The results reveal an initial inventory and ranking of the most difficult wildfire evacuations in the West. These communities share a unique vulnerability in that all residents may not be able to evacuate in scenarios with short warning time. For this reason they represent prime candidates for emergency planning, and monitoring their development is a growing need. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 285
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Bierwagen B.G., Theobald D.M., Pyke C.R., Choate A., Groth P., Thomas J.V., Morefield P., National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments, PNAS, (2010)
[2]  
Chen X., Zhan F.B., Agent based modeling and simulation of urban evacuation: Relative effectiveness of simultaneous versus staged evacuation strategies, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 1, pp. 25-33, (2008)
[3]  
Church R.L., Cova T.J., Mapping evacuation risk on transportation networks using a spatial optimization model, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 8, 1-6, pp. 321-336, (2000)
[4]  
Church R.L., Sexton R.M., Modeling small area evacuation: Can existing transportation infrastructure impede public safety?, (2002)
[5]  
Cohen J.D., Preventing disaster: Home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface, Journal of Forestry, 98, 3, pp. 15-21, (2000)
[6]  
Cohn P.J., Carroll M.S., Kumagai Y., Evacuation behavior during wildfires: Results of three case studies, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 21, 1, pp. 39-48, (2006)
[7]  
Cova T.J., Public safety in the urban-wildland interface: Should fire-prone communities have a maximum occupancy?, Natural Hazards Review, 6, 3, pp. 99-108, (2005)
[8]  
Cova T.J., Church R.L., Modelling community evacuation vulnerability using GIS, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11, 8, pp. 763-784, (1997)
[9]  
Cova T.J., Drews F.A., Siebeneck L.K., Musters A., Protective actions in wildfires: Evacuate or shelter-in-place?, Natural Hazards Review, 10, 4, pp. 151-162, (2009)
[10]  
Cova T.J., Johnson J.P., Microsimulation of neighborhood evacuations in the urban-wildland interface, Environment and Planning A, 34, 12, pp. 2211-2229, (2002)