Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting

被引：6
作者：
Pai V.D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
De Souza A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Patil P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Engineer R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Arya S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Saklani A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai
[2] Department of Medical Gastroenetrology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai
[3] Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai
[4] Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai
来源：
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | 2015年 / 34卷 / 1期
关键词：
Intersphincteric resection; Low rectal cancer; Oncological outcome;
D O I：
10.1007/s12664-014-0522-7
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Introduction: The rectum remains a predominant subsite of colorectal cancer in the Indian population. Unique to the Indian setting are significant social repercussions associated with a permanent stoma. On account of this, many patients who are advised abdominal perineal excision of the rectum (APER) default treatment. Accurate demonstration of the intersphincteric plane with magnetic resonance imaging has made intersphincteric resection (ISR) a viable option. This study is aimed at determining the feasibility and oncological adequacy of ISR in the Indian scenario. Material and Methods: All patients with low rectal cancer who underwent an ISR at the Tata Memorial Centre, from July 2013 to December 2013 were included. Patients with invasion of the external sphincter and suboptimal preoperative sphincter function were excluded. Following standard preoperative staging, patients with a threatened circumferential resection margin (CRM) and/or mesorectal nodes were given preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The oncological adequacy of the procedure was evaluated in terms of margin positivity (distal and CRMs) and lymph node yield. Short-term perioperative outcomes included 30-day mortality, postoperative morbidity, anastomotic leaks, and length of hospital stay. Results: Thirty-three patients with low rectal cancer and a median age of 38 years underwent ISR during the defined study period. Twenty-three patients (70 %) underwent open surgery whereas ten patients received a laparoscopic resection. The median blood loss and hospital stay was 300 mL and 7 days, respectively. Two patients had an involved CRM, but all distal margins were free of tumor. The quality of total mesorectal excision was satisfactory in all patients with a median lymph node yield of 9 nodes. Conclusions: Intersphincteric resection is feasible and oncologically safe in selected patients with low rectal cancer. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes are essential before it can be considered a viable alternative to APER. © 2015, Indian Society of Gastroenterology.
引用
收藏
页码：23 / 28
页数：5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Jayne D.G., Thorpe H.C., Copeland J., Quirke P., Brown J.M., Guillou P.J., Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer, Br J Surg, 97, pp. 1638-1645, (2010)
[2]  
Barreto S.G., Chaubal G.N., Talole S., Et al., Rectal cancer in young Indians—are these cancers different compared to their older counterparts?, Indian J Gastroenterol, 33, pp. 146-150, (2014)
[3]  
Mohandas K.M., Colorectal cancer in India: controversies, enigmas and primary prevention, Indian J Gastroenterol, 30, pp. 3-6, (2011)
[4]  
Swaminathan R., Selvakumaran R., Esmy P.O., Et al., Cancer pattern and survival in a rural district in South India, Cancer Epidemiol, 33, pp. 325-331, (2009)
[5]  
Laurent C., Paumet T., Leblanc F., Denost Q., Rullier E., Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach, Colorectal Dis, 14, pp. 35-41, (2012)
[6]  
Pechlivanides G., Gouvas N., Tsiaoussis J., Et al., Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach, Dig Dis, 25, pp. 94-99, (2007)
[7]  
Schiessel R., Karner-Hanusch J., Herbst F., Teleky B., Wunderlich M., Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours, Br J Surg, 81, pp. 1376-1378, (1994)
[8]  
Denost Q., Laurent C., Capdepont M., Zerbib F., Rullier E., Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer, Dis Colon Rectum, 54, pp. 963-968, (2011)
[9]  
Bruheim K., Tveit K.M., Skovlund E., Et al., Sexual function in females after radiotherapy for rectal cancer, Acta Oncol, 49, pp. 826-832, (2010)
[10]  
Bruheim K., Guren M.G., Dahl A.A., Et al., Sexual function in males after radiotherapy for rectal cancer, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 76, pp. 1012-1017, (2010)
123