Changes in corticospinal excitability during bilateral and unilateral lower-limb force control tasks

被引:0
作者
Akiko Yamaguchi
Atsushi Sasaki
Yohei Masugi
Matija Milosevic
Kimitaka Nakazawa
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo,Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
[2] Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,Institute of Sports Medicine and Science
[3] Tokyo International University,Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering Science
[4] Osaka University,undefined
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2020年 / 238卷
关键词
Ankle dorsiflexion; Corticospinal excitability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Force control; Unilateral; Bilateral;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ankle dorsiflexion force control is essential for performing daily living activities. However, the involvement of the corticospinal pathway during different ankle dorsiflexion tasks is not well understood. The objective of this study was to compare the corticospinal excitability during: (1) unilateral and bilateral; and (2) ballistic and tonic ankle dorsiflexion force control. Fifteen healthy young adults (age: 25.2 ± 2.8 years) participated in this study. Participants performed unilateral and bilateral isometric ankle dorsiflexion force-control tasks, which required matching a visual target (10% of maximal effort) as quickly and precisely as possible during ballistic and tonic contractions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the primary motor cortex to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right tibialis anterior during: (i) pre-contraction phase; (ii) ascending contraction phase; (iii) plateau phase (tonic tasks only); and (iv) resting phase (control). Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude was computed to compare the corticospinal excitability during each experimental condition. MEP amplitudes significantly increased during unilateral contraction compared to bilateral contraction in the pre-contraction phase. There were no significant differences in the MEP amplitudes between the ballistic tasks and tonic tasks in any parts of the contraction phase. Although different strategies are required during ballistic and tonic contractions, the extent of corticospinal involvement appears to be similar. This could be because both tasks enhance the preparation for precise force control. Furthermore, our results suggest that unilateral muscle contractions may largely facilitate the central nervous system during movement preparation for unilateral force control compared to bilateral muscle contractions.
引用
收藏
页码:1977 / 1987
页数:10
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]  
Bastian AJ(2006)Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control Curr Opin Neurobiol 16 645-649
[2]  
Beaulé V(2012)Interhemispheric control of unilateral movement Neural Plast 2012 1-11
[3]  
Tremblay S(1998)Time course of corticospinal excitability in reaction time and self- paced movements Ann Neurol 44 317-325
[4]  
Théoret H(2015)Transcranial magnetic stimulation probes the excitability of the primary motor cortex: a framework to account for the facilitating effects of acute whole-body exercise on motor processes J Sport Health Sci 4 24-29
[5]  
Chen R(2007)Intermanual differences in movement-related interhemispheric inhibition J Cogn Neurosci 19 204-213
[6]  
Yaseen Z(1992)Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex J Physiol 453 525-546
[7]  
Cohen LG(2012)Task-dependent effects of interhemispheric inhibition on motor control Behav Brain Res 226 211-217
[8]  
Hallett M(2010)Voluntary activation of ankle muscles is accompanied by subcortical facilitation of their antagonists J Physiol 588 2391-2402
[9]  
Davranche K(2008)Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM Neuroimage 41 1382-1394
[10]  
Temesi J(2018)Cortical activation associated with motor preparation can be used to predict the freely chosen effector of an upcoming movement and reflects response time: an fMRI decoding study Neuroimage 183 584-596