Supplemental Instruction Online: As Effective as the Traditional Face-to-Face Model?

被引:0
作者
Suzanne E. Hizer
P. W. Schultz
Richard Bray
机构
[1] California State University San Marcos,
来源
Journal of Science Education and Technology | 2017年 / 26卷
关键词
Supplemental Instruction; Biology; Higher education; Online;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Supplemental Instruction (SI) is a well-recognized model of academic assistance with a history of empirical evidence demonstrating increases in student grades and decreases in failure rates across many higher education institutions. However, as college students become more accustomed to learning in online venues, what is not known is whether an SI program offered online could benefit students similarly to SI sessions that occur in face-to-face settings. The in-person (traditional) SI program at California State University San Marcos has demonstrated increases in grades and lower fail rates for courses being supported in science and math. Students enrolled in four biology courses who participated in online SI received increases in academic performance similar to the students in the courses who attended traditional SI. Both the online and traditional SI participating students had higher course grades and lower fail rates as compared to students who did not participate in either form of SI. Self-selection, as measured by past cumulative college grade point average, did not differ between students who attended either form of SI or who did not attend. Student perceptions of online SI were generally positive and appeared to offer an alternative path to receive this valuable academic assistance for some students. Overall, results are promising that the highly effective traditional model can be translated to an online environment.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 115
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Bandura A(1996)Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning Child Dev 67 1206-1222
[2]  
Blanc RA(1994)Supplemental Instruction: increasing student performance and persistence in difficult academic courses Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 69 452-454
[3]  
Martin DC(1983)Breaking the attrition cycle: the effects of Supplemental Instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition J Higher Educ 54 80-89
[4]  
Blanc RA(1997)Supplemental Instruction: a successful approach to learning how to learn college introductory biology J Teach Learn 36 9-20
[5]  
DeBuhr LE(2014)On the effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction: a systematic review of Supplemental Instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010 Rev Educ Res 84 609-639
[6]  
Congos DH(2007)Understanding interventions that encourage minorities to pursue research careers: major questions and appropriate methods CBE Life Sci Educ 6 187-189
[7]  
Langsam DM(2008)An evaluation of the Supplemental Instruction program in a first year calculus course Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 39 843-855
[8]  
Schoeps N(2005)Engaging students: an examination of the effects of teaching strategies on self-efficacy and course climate in a nonmajors physics course J Coll Sci Teach 35 20-37
[9]  
Dawson P(2002)Responding to self-selection bias in assessments of academic support programs: a motivational control study of supplemental Instruction Learn Assist Rev 7 26-146
[10]  
van der Meer J(2009)Science Motivation Questionnaire: construct validation with nonscience majors J Res Sci Teach 46 127-259