Prognostic performance of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Worthing Physiological Scoring system (WPS) in emergency department

被引:25
作者
Ha D.T. [1 ,4 ]
Dang T.Q. [1 ]
Tran N.V. [2 ]
Vo N.Y. [3 ]
Nguyen N.D. [4 ]
Nguyen T.V. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Intensive Care Unit, National Hospital of Can Tho, Can Tho City
[2] Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City
[3] Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City
[4] Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City
[5] Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney
[6] School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney
[7] Centre for Health Technologies, University of Technology, Sydney
关键词
Emergency department; Prognostic model; Rapid emergency medicine score; Worthing physiological scoring system;
D O I
10.1186/s12245-015-0066-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Worthing Physiological Scoring system (WPS) have been developed for predicting in-hospital mortality in nonsurgical emergency department (ED) patients. The prognostic performance of the scoring systems in independent populations has not been clear. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of REMS and WPS systems in the estimation of 30-day mortality risk among medical patients in ED. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective investigation, with the setting being the ED of the National Hospital of Can Tho, Vietnam. We enrolled medical patients aged 16+ years who met the study entry criteria. Clinical data were obtained as required for each scoring system. The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days since hospitalization. The association between each scoring system and mortality was assessed by the hazard ratio (HR) of the Cox’s proportional hazard model. Results: The study involved 1746 patients, average age 65.9 years (SD 17). During the period of follow-up, 172 patients (9.9 %) died. The risk of 30-day mortality was increased by 30 % for each additional REMS unit (HR: 1.28; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.23–1.34) and by 60 % for each additional WPS unit (HR: 1.6; 95 % CI: 1.5–1.7). The AUC of the REMS was 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.67–0.76) which was significantly lower than that of the WPS (0.80; 95 % CI: 0.76–0.83). Conclusions: Both REMS and WPS have good prognostic value in the prediction of death in ED patients. The WPS appeared to have a better prognostic performance than the REMS system. © 2015, Ha et al.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
McClish D.K., Powell S.H., How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit?, Int J Soc Med Dec Making, 9, 2, pp. 125-132, (1989)
[2]  
Olsson T., Terent A., Lind L., Rapid Emergency Medicine score: a new prognostic tool for in-hospital mortality in nonsurgical emergency department patients, J Intern Med, 255, 5, pp. 579-587, (2004)
[3]  
Rhee K.J., Fisher C.J., Willitis N.H., The rapid acute physiology score, Am J Emerg Med, 5, 4, pp. 278-282, (1987)
[4]  
Duckitt R.W., Buxton-Thomas R., Walker J., Cheek E., Bewick V., Venn R., Et al., Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions. An observational, population-based single-centre study, Br J Anaesth, 98, 6, pp. 769-774, (2007)
[5]  
Prytherch D.R., Sirl J.S., Schmidt P., Featherstone P.I., Weaver P.C., Smith G.B., The use of routine laboratory data to predict in-hospital death in medical admissions, Resuscitation, 66, 2, pp. 203-207, (2005)
[6]  
Froom P., Shimoni Z., Prediction of hospital mortality rates by admission laboratory tests, Clin Chem, 52, 2, pp. 325-328, (2006)
[7]  
Brabrand M., Folkestad L., Clausen N.G., Knudsen T., Hallas J., Risk scoring systems for adults admitted to the emergency department: a systematic review, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 18, (2010)
[8]  
Goodacre S., Turner J., Nicholl J., Prediction of mortality among emergency medical admissions, Emerg Med J, 23, 5, pp. 372-375, (2006)
[9]  
DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach, Biometrics, 44, 3, pp. 837-845, (1988)
[10]  
Challen K., Goodacre S.W., Predictive scoring in non-trauma emergency patients: a scoping review, Emerg Med J, 28, 10, pp. 827-837, (2011)