The changing European regulatory landscape: Present and future challenges to the development of biotechnological and emerging technology products

被引:0
作者
Tsang L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Arnold and Porter LLP, London
[2] Tower 42, London, EC2N 1HQ
关键词
European Union; Medicinal Product; Advance Therapy Medicinal Product; Marketing Authorisation Application; Biological Medicinal Product;
D O I
10.2165/00124363-200418010-00006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Whilst the US has traditionally been considered the Agency that sets the gold standard for medicines regulation, with the increasing demand for global cooperation and harmonisation of technical conformity and regulatory control, consideration should be given to regulatory requirements in jurisdictions other than the US. The European Union is becoming an important region for global product development. This review sets out scientific and public policy aspects that underpin the European legislative framework for certain healthcare products, including those derived from novel technological platforms. This review attempts to highlight some of the current and new challenges to the development of biotechnological and emerging technology products. There seems little doubt that the whole area of regulatory laws and policy will present new challenges to companies and their advisors in the coming years. It should be recognised that the development of high technology products is more costly and carries higher business risks compared with conventional pharmaceutical products. A successful product development should therefore be underpinned by not only good science, but a thorough understanding of the regulatory environment, which is increasingly complex. The development programme should integrate regulatory strategy at the early stages. This will help identify, address and manage potential regulatory risks that will greatly facilitate the progress of research and development, and the timeliness of the commercial launch of a product.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 29
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Gene therapy under the cloud, Lancet, 355, 9201, (2000)
  • [22] Yang Y., Nunes F.A., Berenscsi K., Et al., Cellular immunity to viral antigens limits El-deleted adenoviruses for gene therapy, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 91, pp. 4407-4411, (1994)
  • [23] Yang Y., Li Q., Ertl H.C.J., Et al., Cellular and humoral immune responses to viral antigens create barriers to lung-directed gene therapy with recombinant adenoviruses, J Virol, 69, pp. 2004-2015, (1995)
  • [24] ICH Communication Paper: The First Workshop on Gene Therapy, (2002)
  • [25] Hacein-Bey-Abina S., LeDeist F., Carlier F., Et al., Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex-vivo gene therapy, N Engl J Med, 346, 16, pp. 1185-1193, (2002)
  • [26] Report from the Ad Hoc Meeting of CPMP Gene Therapy Expert Group, (2003)
  • [27] Recommendations of the GTAC/CSM Working Party on Retroviruses, (2003)
  • [28] Federal Register, 66, 5, (2001)
  • [29] Current Good Tissue Practice for Manufacturers of Human Cellular and Tissue Based Products: Fed Regist, 66, 13, (2001)
  • [30] Nelson L., Cell-based therapies in the EU, Regul Aff J, 14, 6, pp. 448-449, (2003)