Assessment of recharge capacity potential of groundwater using comparative multi-criteria decision analysis approaches

被引:0
作者
Ionut Minea
Daniel Boicu
Oana-Elena Chelariu
Marina Iosub
Andrei Enea
机构
[1] Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi,Faculty of Geography and Geology
[2] Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi,The Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Exact Sciences and Natural Sciences
[3] Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi,Integrated Centre of Environmental Science Studies in the North Eastern Region
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2022年 / 32卷
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; catastrophe theory; groundwater recharge potential; groundwater vulnerability; Innovative Trend Analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Groundwater resources have always been some of the most valuable resources of human settlements. Climate changes and ever-increasing water demands registered in the last century have led to diminishing levels of groundwater reserves, as well as reduced recharging potential. Therefore, in order to use groundwater aquifers in a sustainable manner, it is required to identify areas with higher replenishing potential. The current study addresses the issue of generating a map for identifying differently ranked groundwater recharging potential values, in the aquifers of the Moldavian Plain region, Romania. For the purpose of conducting the analysis, maps were created through GIS based multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Catastrophe Theory (CT), with seven relevant, thematic, spatial layers: precipitation distribution, lithological strata, soil texture, declivity, drainage density, land use and the distribution of groundwater level tendencies. The results of the two methods of analysis are similar. Prediction differences are of maximum 3%, in the case of extreme classes (very bad and very good) and in the case of middle classes the deviation is not greater than 0.4%. Following the validation of the results generated by the two methods that were applied, it was observed that the predictions offered by CT are more accurate. This aspect can be based on the fact that the main factors that contribute to the prediction are different. This type of workflow emphasizes the necessity of implementing appropriate groundwater management plans for mitigating reservoir scarcity/depletion, and recommending sustainable solutions for future groundwater exploitation practices.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 756
页数:21
相关论文
共 124 条
[11]  
Venkatramanan S(2018)Morphometric analysis of Vaitarna and Ulhas river basins, Maharashtra, India: Using geospatial techniques Applied Water Science 8 158-885
[12]  
Bandoc G(2019)Comparison among influencing factor, frequency ratio, and analytical hierarchy process techniques for groundwater potential zonation in Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India Groundwater for Sustainable Development 8 617-1063
[13]  
Prăvălie R(2008)Global-scale modeling of groundwater recharge Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 12 863-948
[14]  
Bădăluţă C A(2015)ROCADA: A gridded daily climatic dataset over Romania (1961–2013) for nine meteorological variables Natural Hazards 78 1045-486
[15]  
Perţoiu A(2014)The global groundwater crisis Nature Climate Change 4 945-3051
[16]  
Ionita M(2001)The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition Operations Research 49 469-12
[17]  
Boufekane A(2015)Global change and the groundwater management challenge Water Resources Research 51 3031-624
[18]  
Meddi H(2018)The spatial and temporal variability of groundwater vulnerability and health risk in the Limin District, Harbin, China Water 10 686-1401
[19]  
Meddi M(2020)Assessment of flash flood susceptibility potential in Moldavian Plain (Romania) Journal of Flood Risk Management 13 1-511
[20]  
Çelik R(2017)Comparison of analytic hierarchy process, catastrophe and entropy techniques for evaluating groundwater prospect of hard-rock aquifer systems Journal of Hydrology 548 605-1386