Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models

被引:0
作者
Thomas Niemand
Robert Mai
机构
[1] Clausthal University of Technology,Department of Market Research
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes ComUE,Department of Marketing, Grenoble Ecole de Management
来源
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 2018年 / 46卷
关键词
Structural equation modeling; Fit indices; Cutoff values; Monte Carlo simulation; Accuracy; Flexible cutoff values;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Researchers often struggle when applying ‘golden rules of thumb’ to evaluate structural equation models. This paper questions the notion of universal thresholds and calls for adjusted orientation points that account for sample size, factor loadings, the number of latent variables and indicators, as well as data (non-)normality. This research explores the need for flexible cutoffs and their accuracy in single- and two-index strategies. Study 1 reveals that many indices are biased; thus, rigid cutoffs can become imprecise. Flexible cutoff values are shown to compensate for the unique distorting patterns and prove to be particularly beneficial for moderate misspecification. Study 2 sheds further light on this ‘gray’ area of misspecification and disentangles the different sources of misspecification. Study 3 finally investigates the performance of flexible cutoffs for non-normal data. Having substantiated higher performance for flexible reference values, this paper provides to managers an easy-to-use tool that facilitates the determination of adequate cutoffs.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1172
页数:24
相关论文
共 166 条
[21]  
Ray S(2007)Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types Multivariate Behavioral Research 42 509-529
[22]  
Zavisca J(2000)Performance of modified test statistics in covariance and correlation structure analysis under conditions of multivariate nonnormality Structural Equation Modeling 7 356-410
[23]  
Bone PF(2006)Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models Multivariate Behavioral Research 41 65-83
[24]  
Sharma S(2014)Introduction to theory and practice in marketing conference special section of marketing science Marketing Science 33 1-5
[25]  
Shimp TA(2004)The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 57 327-351
[26]  
Boomsma A(2007)Testing! Testing! One, two, three–testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences 42 841-850
[27]  
Browne MW(2011)Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices Psychological Methods 16 319-336
[28]  
Cudeck R(2007)The model-size effect on traditional and modified tests of covariance structures Structural Equation Modeling 14 361-390
[29]  
Chen F(1998)Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification Psychological Methods 3 424-453
[30]  
Curran PJ(1999)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling 6 1-55