Reducing the water cost in livestock with adoption of best practices

被引:0
|
作者
Julio Cesar Pascale Palhares
Esther R. Afonso
Augusto H. Gameiro
机构
[1] Embrapa Southeast Livestock,Department of Animal Science, School of Veterinary and Animal Science
[2] University of São Paulo,undefined
关键词
Consumption; Drinking water; Nutritional technologies; Nutrient balance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of the study were to propose and evaluate a method to calculate the water cost in livestock production, considering best practices regarding nutritional and waste management. Diets with more nutritional advanced technologies and with the best waste management had the lowest total water cost in all farm sizes. Farmers that did not balance the diets considering nutritional technologies and that use manure as fertilizer with high environmental risk, without considering the nutrient balance, had the most expensive water. The cost of no-point source pollution in the total cost of water represented an average of 99.1% for NB = 1.0, 98.8% for NB = 0.75 and 98.3% for NB = 0.5 for all diets. The percentage of consumption water prices in the total cost of water varied from 0.9 to 1.7%. The study shows that the aggregation of nutrition and waste management has a direct positive impact on the reduction in the cost of water, and indirect positive impacts on the reduction in natural resource consumption by the production system, as well as its polluting potential. The water cost method proposed could contribute to the ongoing debate with respect to sustainable intensification of livestock, and balance of their environmental and economic aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:2013 / 2023
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strategies for the Rapid Adoption of Best Practices on the Labor and Delivery Unit
    Tillett, Jackie
    Kruger, Bradley
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2009, 23 (02) : 102 - 104
  • [42] Intelligent-field-infrastructure adoption: Approach and best practices
    Almadi, Soloman
    Al-Dhubaib, Tofig
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2012, 64 (05): : 102 - 105
  • [43] Breaking bad news 3: Encouraging the adoption of best practices
    Campbell, EM
    Sanson-Fisher, RW
    BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) : 73 - 80
  • [44] Public Willingness to Pay for Farmer Adoption of Best Management Practices
    Lambert, Lixia H.
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Ripberger, Joseph T.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (02) : 224 - 241
  • [45] Adoption of the Linked Data Best Practices in Different Topical Domains
    Schmachtenberg, Max
    Bizer, Christian
    Paulheim, Heiko
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2014, PT I, 2014, 8796 : 245 - 260
  • [46] A Newborn Screening Education Best Practices Framework: Development and Adoption
    Evans, Adrianna
    LeBlanc, Keri
    Bonhomme, Natasha
    Shone, Scott M.
    Gaviglio, Amy
    Freedenberg, Debra
    Penn, Jeremy
    Johnson, Carol
    Vogel, Beth
    Dolan, Siobhan M.
    Goldenberg, Aaron J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2019, 5 (02)
  • [47] Large animal rescue and livestock emergency response training best practices
    Raymond, Susan
    MacPherson, Victor
    Kelly, Bruce
    Gimenez-Husted, Rebecca
    Ecker, Gayle
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 36 (03): : 19 - 19
  • [48] Best management practices and water quality
    Plum Creek Timber Company, 1 Concourse Parkway NE, Atlanta, GA 30328
    不详
    NCASI Spec. Rep., 2006, 06-06 (1-11):
  • [49] Best practices for photocatalytic water splitting
    Hisatomi, Takashi
    Domen, Kazunari
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 7 (09): : 1082 - 1084
  • [50] Understanding Adoption of Livestock Health Management Practices: The Case of Bovine Leukosis Virus
    Gramig, Benjamin M.
    Wolf, Christopher A.
    Lupi, Frank
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2010, 58 (03): : 343 - 360