Reducing the water cost in livestock with adoption of best practices

被引:0
|
作者
Julio Cesar Pascale Palhares
Esther R. Afonso
Augusto H. Gameiro
机构
[1] Embrapa Southeast Livestock,Department of Animal Science, School of Veterinary and Animal Science
[2] University of São Paulo,undefined
关键词
Consumption; Drinking water; Nutritional technologies; Nutrient balance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of the study were to propose and evaluate a method to calculate the water cost in livestock production, considering best practices regarding nutritional and waste management. Diets with more nutritional advanced technologies and with the best waste management had the lowest total water cost in all farm sizes. Farmers that did not balance the diets considering nutritional technologies and that use manure as fertilizer with high environmental risk, without considering the nutrient balance, had the most expensive water. The cost of no-point source pollution in the total cost of water represented an average of 99.1% for NB = 1.0, 98.8% for NB = 0.75 and 98.3% for NB = 0.5 for all diets. The percentage of consumption water prices in the total cost of water varied from 0.9 to 1.7%. The study shows that the aggregation of nutrition and waste management has a direct positive impact on the reduction in the cost of water, and indirect positive impacts on the reduction in natural resource consumption by the production system, as well as its polluting potential. The water cost method proposed could contribute to the ongoing debate with respect to sustainable intensification of livestock, and balance of their environmental and economic aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:2013 / 2023
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Louisiana crawfish farmer adoption of best management practices
    Nyaupane, N. P.
    Gillespie, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2011, 66 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [22] Improved Microbial Water Quality Associated with Best Management Practices on Coastal Dairies and Livestock Grazing Operations
    Voeller, Dylan J.
    Ketcham, Brannon J.
    Becker, Benjamin H.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 76 (01) : 139 - 149
  • [23] WATER INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES
    GREEN, N
    PATRICK, R
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1994, 86 (03): : 74 - 79
  • [24] Evaluation of the Best Management Practices for Reducing Phosphorus Load in a Watershed in Terms of Cost and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Jeong, Dae Seong
    Kim, Joon Ha
    Kim, Jin Hwi
    Park, Yongeun
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [25] CONSTRAINTS PERCEIVED BY THE FARM WOMEN IN ADOPTION OF IMPROVED LIVESTOCK REARING PRACTICES
    Gupta, Lokesh
    Gupta, Ritu
    Dhuria, R. K.
    VETERINARY PRACTITIONER, 2008, 9 (01): : 76 - 78
  • [26] Cost assessment of the adoption of harvesting best practice (HBP)
    Nothard, B.
    Thompson, M.
    Patane, P.
    Landers, G.
    Norris, C. A.
    Poggio, M.
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2019, 121 (1447): : 524 - 531
  • [27] Cost-share incentives and best management practices in a pilot water quality program
    Houston, JE
    Sun, HL
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1999, 24 (01) : 239 - 252
  • [28] Spatial Dependence and Determinants of Dairy Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Protection in New Zealand
    Wei Yang
    Basil Sharp
    Environmental Management, 2017, 59 : 594 - 603
  • [29] Privatization and water service provision in the United States: a recommendation for expanded oversight and the development and adoption of best practices
    Cotta, Sabrina A.
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 37 (07) : 818 - 830
  • [30] Spatial Dependence and Determinants of Dairy Farmers' Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Protection in New Zealand
    Yang, Wei
    Sharp, Basil
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 59 (04) : 594 - 603