Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies

被引:0
作者
Daniel Schiff
机构
[1] Georgia Institute of Technology,School of Public Policy
来源
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education | 2022年 / 32卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Ethics; Policy; Social implications of technology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As of 2021, more than 30 countries have released national artificial intelligence (AI) policy strategies. These documents articulate plans and expectations regarding how AI will impact policy sectors, including education, and typically discuss the social and ethical implications of AI. This article engages in thematic analysis of 24 such national AI policy strategies, reviewing the role of education in global AI policy discourse. It finds that the use of AI in education (AIED) is largely absent from policy conversations, while the instrumental value of education in supporting an AI-ready workforce and training more AI experts is overwhelmingly prioritized. Further, the ethical implications of AIED receive scant attention despite the prominence of AI ethics discussion generally in these documents. This suggests that AIED and its broader policy and ethical implications—good or bad—have failed to reach mainstream awareness and the agendas of key decision-makers, a concern given that effective policy and careful consideration of ethics are inextricably linked, as this article argues. In light of these findings, the article applies a framework of five AI ethics principles to consider ways in which policymakers can better incorporate AIED’s implications. Finally, the article offers recommendations for AIED scholars on strategies for engagement with the policymaking process, and for performing ethics and policy-oriented AIED research to that end, in order to shape policy deliberations on behalf of the public good.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 563
页数:36
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Adadi A(2018)Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).  IEEE Access 6 52138-52160
[2]  
Berrada M(2020)Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic Higher Education Studies 10 16-25
[3]  
Ali W(2008)Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda Journal of Educational Technology and Society 11 29-40
[4]  
Amiel T(2015)Why are there still so many jobs? the history and future of workplace automation Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 3-30
[5]  
Reeves TC(2016)Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies Journal of Modern Transportation 24 284-303
[6]  
Autor DH(2015)The costs of self-driving cars: reconciling freedom and privacy with tort liability in autonomous vehicle regulation Yale JL & Tech. 17 171-507
[7]  
Bagloee SA(2017)Nudging for good: Robots and the ethical appropriateness of nurturing empathy and charitable behavior AI & SOCIETY 32 499-161
[8]  
Tavana M(2002)Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do Public Administration Review 62 145-915
[9]  
Asadi M(2013)Style in science communication Public Understanding of Science 22 904-1043
[10]  
Oliver T(2020)Through growth to achievement: Examining Edtech as a solution to australia’s declining educational achievement Policy Futures in Education 18 1026-402