Growth of infant fecal bacteria on commercial prebiotics

被引:0
作者
Věra Bunešová
Eva Vlková
Vojtěch Rada
Vladimíra Kňazovická
Šárka Ročková
Martina Geigerová
Matěj Božik
机构
[1] Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources
[2] Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra,Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences
来源
Folia Microbiologica | 2012年 / 57卷
关键词
Lactobacillus; Caesarean Section; Fecal Sample; Infant Formula; High Count;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fecal bacteria from 33 infants (aged 1 to 6 months) were tested for growth on commercial prebiotics. The children were born vaginally (20) or by caesarean section (13). Bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli, and total anaerobes in fecal samples were enumerated by selective agars and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The total fecal bacteria were inoculated into cultivation media containing 2 % Vivinal® (galactooligosaccharides—GOS) or Raftilose® P95 (fructooligosaccharides—FOS) as a single carbon source and bacteria were enumerated again after 24 h of anaerobic cultivation. Bifidobacteria dominated, reaching counts of 9–10 log colony-forming units (CFU)/g in 17 children born vaginally and in seven children delivered by caesarean section. In these infants, lactobacilli were more frequently detected and a lower number of E. coli and gram-negative bacteria were determined compared to bifidobacteria-negative infants. Clostridia dominated in children without bifidobacteria, reaching counts from 7 to 9 log CFU/g. Both prebiotics supported all groups of bacteria tested. In children with naturally high counts of bifidobacteria, bifidobacteria dominated also after cultivation on prebiotics, reaching counts from 8.23 to 8.77 log CFU/mL. In bifidobacteria-negative samples, clostridia were supported by prebiotics, reaching counts from 7.17 to 7.69 log CFU/mL. There were no significant differences between bacterial growth on Vivinal® and Raftilose® P95 and counts determined by cultivation and FISH. Prebiotics should selectively stimulate the growth of desirable bacteria such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. However, our results showed that commercially available FOS and GOS may stimulate also other fecal bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 275
页数:2
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Biasucci G(2010)Mode of delivery affects the bacterial community in the newborn gut Early Hum Dev 86 S13-S15
[2]  
Rubini M(2008)Structural and functional aspects of prebiotics used in infant nutrition J Nutr 138 1818S-1828S
[3]  
Riboni S(2005)Prebiotic effect of fructooligosaccharide supplemented term infant formula at two concentrations compared with unsupplemented formula and human milk J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 40 157-164
[4]  
Morelli L(2000)Analysis of intestinal flora development in brest-fed and formula-fed infants by using molecular identifibation and detection methods J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30 61-67
[5]  
Bessi E(2008)Mode of delivery—effect on gut microbiota and humoral immunity Neonatology 93 236-240
[6]  
Retetangos C(2010)Programming infant gut microbiota: influence of dietary and environmental factors Curr Opin Biotechnol 21 149-156
[7]  
Boehm G(2002)Dosage related bifidogenic effects of galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides in formula-fed term infants J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 34 291-295
[8]  
Moro G(2009)Molecular ecological analysis of fecal bacterial populations from term infants fed formula supplemented with selected blends of prebiotics Appl Environ Microbiol 75 1121-1128
[9]  
Euler A(2007)Nutritional support for the infant’s immune system Nutr Rev 65 347-360
[10]  
Mitchell DK(2006)Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy Pediatrics 118 518-521