Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence and Correlation with Various Parameters After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Single Center Experience

[1] Heidenreich A(2011)EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease Eur Urol. 59 61-71

[2] Bellmunt J(2001)Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot J Urol 165 1964-1966

[3] Bolla M(2008)Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches Urology 72 15-23

[4] Joniau S(2012)Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample Eur Urol 61 679-685

[5] Mason M(2011)Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 59 702-707

[6] Matveev V(2010)Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up Eur Urol 58 838-846

[7] Abbou CC(2007)Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes J Urol 177 540-545

[8] Hoznek A(2014)Epidemiology of prostate cancer in India Meta Gene 2 596-605

[9] Salomon L(2007)Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures Cancer 110 1951-1958

[10] Olsson LE(2014)Continence outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy: our experience from 150 consecutive patients Indian J Urol 30 374-377

[1] Heidenreich A(2011)EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease Eur Urol. 59 61-71

[2] Bellmunt J(2001)Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot J Urol 165 1964-1966

[3] Bolla M(2008)Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches Urology 72 15-23

[4] Joniau S(2012)Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample Eur Urol 61 679-685

[5] Mason M(2011)Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 59 702-707

[6] Matveev V(2010)Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up Eur Urol 58 838-846

[7] Abbou CC(2007)Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes J Urol 177 540-545

[8] Hoznek A(2014)Epidemiology of prostate cancer in India Meta Gene 2 596-605

[9] Salomon L(2007)Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures Cancer 110 1951-1958

[10] Olsson LE(2014)Continence outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy: our experience from 150 consecutive patients Indian J Urol 30 374-377