Examining Intentional Knowing Among Secondary School Students: Through the Lens of Metacognition

被引:0
作者
Chwee Beng Lee
机构
[1] University of Western Sydney,School of Education
来源
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher | 2013年 / 22卷
关键词
Intentional learning; Intentional knowing; Metacognition; Factor analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we examine intentional knowing through the lens of metacognition. Learners are not just active in their construction of meaning, but they can also be intentional. This would mean that they are cognitively engaged in the learning process, monitoring and regulating their learning. To learn intentionally, students must consciously understand and be able to define their strengths and weaknesses, their learning processes, how they examine the way they execute learning tasks, monitor learning, evaluate learning, and whether they innovate in order to learn intentionally. The two main purposes of this study are to examine whether the IKIS (revised MAI) is able to provide a six-factor solution to explain intentional knowing and to predict the influences of age and intellectual ability on students’ intentional knowing. This study involved 732 secondary school students, and several statistical analyses such as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. A six-factor solution was generated and the implications of this study are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 90
页数:11
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Allon M(1994)The relation between metacognition and intelligence in normal adolescents: Some tentative but surprising findings Psychology in the Schools 31 93-97
[2]  
Gutkin TB(1993)Lernstrategien, motivationale Orientierungen und Selbstwirksamkeitsüberzeugungen im Kontext schulischen Lernens Unterrichtswissenschaft 21 327-354
[3]  
Bruning R(1966)The scree test for the number of factors Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 245-276
[4]  
Baumert J(1993)Metacognition ang giftedness: The state of the relationship Gifted Child Quarterly 37 105-112
[5]  
Cattell RB(2009)Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20 198-206
[6]  
Cheng P(2008)Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation European Psychologist 13 277-287
[7]  
Choy SC(1979)Metacognition and cognitive monitoring A new era of cognitive developmental inquiry American Psychologist 34 906-911
[8]  
Cheah PK(2006)Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 69-119
[9]  
Efklides A(1995)Metacogniton and high intellectual ability: Insights from the study of learning-disabled gifted students Gifted Child Quarterly 39 95-109
[10]  
Flavell JH(1999)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling 6 1-55