Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Benjamin Zendejas
Raaj K. Ruparel
David A. Cook
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,Department of Surgery
[2] Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,Division of General Internal Medicine
[3] Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,Multidisciplinary Simulation Center
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2016年 / 30卷
关键词
Validation; Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery ; Simulation; Assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 520
页数:8
相关论文
共 199 条
  • [1] Derossis AM(1998)Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills Am J Surg 175 482-487
  • [2] Fried GM(2004)Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery Ann Surg 240 518-525
  • [3] Abrahamowicz M(2006)Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application Am J Med 119 e7-e16
  • [4] Sigman HH(2003)Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data Med Educ 37 830-837
  • [5] Barkun JS(2010)FLS and FES: comprehensive models of training and assessment Surg Clin N Am 90 535-558
  • [6] Meakins JL(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Ann Intern Med 151 W64-883
  • [7] Fried GM(2013)Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality Acad Med 88 872-250
  • [8] Feldman LS(2014)What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 19 233-988
  • [9] Vassiliou MC(2011)Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA 306 978-256
  • [10] Fraser SA(2015)Linking Simulation-Based Educational Assessments and Patient-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Acad Med 90 246-174