A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Methodology Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: Application to Water Resources Management

被引:0
作者
Ehsan Pourmand
Najmeh Mahjouri
Maryam Hosseini
Farzaneh Nik-Hemmat
机构
[1] K. N. Toosi University of Technology,Faculty of Civil Engineering
[2] Shahid Chamran University,Faculty of Civil Engineering
来源
Water Resources Management | 2020年 / 34卷
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); TOPSIS; Interval Type-2 fuzzy set (IT2FS); Negotiation power; Water resources management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, a new fuzzy group decision-making methodology which determines and incorporates negotiation powers of decision makers is developed. The proposed method is based on a combination of interval type-2 fuzzy sets and a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model, namely TOPSIS. To examine the applicability of the proposed methodology, it is used for finding the best scenario of allocating water and reclaimed wastewater to domestic, agricultural, and industrial water sectors and restoring groundwater quantity and quality in the Varamin region located in Tehran metropolitan area in Iran. The results show that the selected scenario leads to an acceptable groundwater conservation level during a long-term planning horizon. Although the capital cost of this scenario is high, which leads to groundwater restoration during the 34-year planning horizon, it is determined as the best allocation scenario. This scenario also entails the second least pumping cost, due to less water allocation from the groundwater. To evaluate the results of the proposed methodology, they are compared with those obtained using some well-known interval type-2 decision-making approaches including arithmetic-based, TOPSIS-based, and likelihood-based comparison methods. The Spearman correlation coefficient shows that the obtained results generally concur with those of the other methods. It is also concluded that the proposed methodology gives more reasonable results by calculating and considering the negotiation powers of decision makers in an extended TOPSIS-based group decision-making model.
引用
收藏
页码:4067 / 4092
页数:25
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Chen S-M(2014)Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 44 1665-1673
  • [2] Hong J-A(2010)Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets Expert Syst Appl 37 824-833
  • [3] Chen S-M(2010)Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method Expert Syst Appl 37 2790-2798
  • [4] Lee L-W(2012)Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets Expert Syst Appl 39 5295-5308
  • [5] Chen S-M(2015)An interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions using a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis Comput Ind Eng 85 57-72
  • [6] Lee L-W(2020)An agent-based conflict resolution model for urban water resources management Sustain Cities Soc 57 102112-232
  • [7] Chen S-M(2016)Developing water quality management policies for the Chitgar urban lake: application of fuzzy social choice and evidential reasoning methods Environ Earth Sci 75 404-57
  • [8] Yang M-W(2016)Developing an MCDM method for robot selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets Robot Comput Integr Manuf 37 221-550
  • [9] Lee L-W(2013)Type-2 fuzzy set extension of DEMATEL method combined with perceptual computing for decision making Journal of Industrial Engineering International 9 10-4148
  • [10] Yang S-W(2014)Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets Knowl-Based Syst 59 48-110