Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models

被引:0
作者
Biswajeet Pradhan
Saro Lee
机构
[1] Dresden University of Technology,Faculty of Forestry, Geo and Hydro
[2] Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM),Science, Institute of Cartography
来源
Environmental Earth Sciences | 2010年 / 60卷
关键词
Landslide; Hazard; Frequency ratio; Logistic regression; Artificial neural network; GIS; Malaysia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper summarizes findings of landslide hazard analysis on Penang Island, Malaysia, using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models with the aid of GIS tools and remote sensing data. Landslide locations were identified and an inventory map was constructed by trained geomorphologists using photo-interpretation from archived aerial photographs supported by field surveys. A SPOT 5 satellite pan sharpened image acquired in January 2005 was used for land-cover classification supported by a topographic map. The above digitally processed images were subsequently combined in a GIS with ancillary data, for example topographical (slope, aspect, curvature, drainage), geological (litho types and lineaments), soil types, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data, and used to construct a spatial database using GIS and image processing. Three landslide hazard maps were constructed on the basis of landslide inventories and thematic layers, using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Further, each thematic layer’s weight was determined by the back-propagation training method and landslide hazard indices were calculated using the trained back-propagation weights. The results of the analysis were verified and compared using the landslide location data and the accuracy observed was 86.41, 89.59, and 83.55% for frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models, respectively. On the basis of the higher percentages of landslide bodies predicted in very highly hazardous and highly hazardous zones, the results obtained by use of the logistic regression model were slightly more accurate than those from the other models used for landslide hazard analysis. The results from the neural network model suggest the effect of topographic slope is the highest and most important factor with weightage value (1.0), which is more than twice that of the other factors, followed by the NDVI (0.52), and then precipitation (0.42). Further, the results revealed that distance from lineament has the lowest weightage, with a value of 0. This shows that in the study area, fault lines and structural features do not contribute much to landslide triggering.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1054
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Landslide hazard mapping in the Constantine city, Northeast Algeria using frequency ratio, weighting factor, logistic regression, weights of evidence, and analytical hierarchy process methods [J].
Hamid Bourenane ;
Mohamed Said Guettouche ;
Youcef Bouhadad ;
Massinissa Braham .
Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9
[42]   Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches [J].
B. Pradhan .
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2010, 38 :301-320
[43]   APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND LOGISTIC REGRESSION METHODS TO LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING AND COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS FOR THE ULUS DISTRICT, BARTIN [J].
Eker, Arif Mert ;
Dikmen, Mehmet ;
Cambazoglu, Selim ;
Duzgun, Sebnem H. S. B. ;
Akgun, Haluk .
JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2012, 27 (01) :163-173
[44]   Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Using the Data Mining Models Artificial Neural Network and Boosted Tree [J].
Oh, Hyun-Joo ;
Lee, Saro .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2017, 7 (10)
[45]   Landslide susceptibility mapping at Ovack-Karabuk (Turkey) using different artificial neural network models: comparison of training algorithms [J].
Can, Asli ;
Dagdelenler, Gulseren ;
Ercanoglu, Murat ;
Sonmez, Harun .
BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 78 (01) :89-102
[46]   Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review [J].
Dreiseitl, S ;
Ohno-Machado, L .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2002, 35 (5-6) :352-359
[47]   Comparison and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained from weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models [J].
Christos Polykretis ;
Christos Chalkias .
Natural Hazards, 2018, 93 :249-274
[48]   Simulating the Expansion of Built-Up Areas using the Models of Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Network, and Geo-Mod in Marivan City, Iran [J].
Vafaei, Sasan ;
Karim, Mohammed Mahdi ;
Soltanian, Satar ;
Rasooli, Sabri .
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 49 (05) :1081-1090
[49]   Groundwater productivity potential mapping using frequency ratio and evidential belief function and artificial neural network models: focus on topographic factors [J].
Kim, Jeong-Cheol ;
Jung, Hyung-Sup ;
Lee, Saro .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2018, 20 (06) :1436-1451
[50]   Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Mapping of Regional-scale Landslide Susceptibility in Volcanic Mountains of West Java']Java (Indonesia) [J].
Ngadisih ;
Bhandary, Netra P. ;
Yatabe, Ryuichi ;
Dahal, Ranjan K. .
5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EARTHHAZARD AND DISASTER MITIGATION, 2016, 1730