A Prospective Study on Conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral in Stable Adult Liver Transplant Recipients

被引:0
作者
Ashok Jain
Mary Gadomski
John Fung
机构
来源
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 1999年 / 44卷
关键词
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; SANDIMUNE; NEORAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neoral is a microemulsion formulation ofcyclosporin (CyA), which has more consistent and betterpharmacokinetics parameters with improvedbioavailability compared to conversional formulation ofSandimmune. Sixty-four stable adults (age >18 years),who had received liver transplants (LTx) and were onSandimmune-based immunosuppression, were converted toNeoral on milligram for milligram basis. Mean age was 52.5 ± 13.5 years and male/femaledistribution was 22/42. Mean interval from LTx toconversion was 109.2 ± 136 months. In 13 patients(20% ) the dose of Neoral was reduced because of anincrease in serum creatinine (N = 9), hyperkalemia (N =1), headache (N = 1), peripheral parasthesia (N = 1),and a general sense of discomfort (N = 1).Interestingly, in two patients a decrease in the troughconcentration was observed with the increase in liverenzymes. Both patients responded to an increase inNeoral dose. The present study suggests while themajority of the stable liver transplant patients (77%)can be safely converted to Neoral from Sandimmune ona milligram to milligram basis, they need to becarefully monitored for renal function, liver function,and trough concentration of CyA.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 777
页数:2
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Ander L(1993)Influence of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, trough concentrations, and AUC monitoring on outcome after kidney transplantation Clin Pharmacol Ther 54 205-218
[2]  
Kahan BD(1994)The neoral formulation: Improved correlation between cyclosporine trough levels and exposure in stable renal transplant re cipients Transplant Proc 26 2940-2943
[3]  
Kahn BD(1997)Neoral compared to sandimmune is associated with a decrease in histologic severity of rejection in patients undergoing primary liver transplantation Transplantation 64 726-731
[4]  
Dunn J(1996)A new oral formulation of cyclosporine for early oral immunosuppression therapy in liver transplant recipients Transplantation 62 1063-1068
[5]  
Fitts C(1996)Absorption of cyclosporine neoral early after liver transplantation: Influence of bile on oral absorption Transplant Proc 28 2237-2238
[6]  
Van Buren D(1991)Comparative study of cyclosporine and FK 506 dosage requirements in adult and pediatric orthotopic liver transplant patients Transplant Proc 23 :2763-2766
[7]  
Wombolt D(1997)Pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in maintenance pediatric liver transplant recipients Transplantation 63 1762-1767
[8]  
Pollak R(1996)Conve rsion and pharmacokine tic studies of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplant patients Transplantation 62 1068-1071
[9]  
Carson R(1996)Successful reconversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine a neoral in pediatric liver recipients Trans Proc 28 2276-2278
[10]  
Alexander JW(1997)A pharmacokinetic comparison of the corn oil versus microemulsion gelcap formulation of cyclosporin used Transplant 10 217-222