Efficient aero-structural design optimization: Coupling based on reverse iteration of structural model

被引:0
作者
YingTao Zuo
ZhengHong Gao
Gang Chen
XiaoPeng Wang
YueMing Li
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytechnical University,National Key Laboratory of Aerodynamic Design and Research
[2] Xi’ an Jiaotong University,State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures
[3] Shanghai Electro-Mechanical Engineering Institute,undefined
来源
Science China Technological Sciences | 2015年 / 58卷
关键词
aero-structural optimization; reverse iteration; cruise shape; CFD/CSD; true optimum; semi-coupled;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional coupled multi-disciplinary design optimization based on computational fluid dynamics/computational structure dynamics (CFD/CSD) aims to optimize the jig shape of aircraft, and general multi-disciplinary design optimization methodology is adopted. No special consideration is given to the aircraft itself during the optimization. The main drawback of these methodologies is the huge expanse and the low efficiency. To solve this problem, we put forward to optimize the cruise shape directly based on the fact that the cruise shape can be transformed into jig shape, and a methodology named reverse iteration of structural model (RISM) is proposed to get the aero-structural performance of cruise shape. The main advantage of RISM is that the efficiency can be improved by at least four times compared with loosely-coupled aeroelastic analysis and it maintains almost the same fidelity of loosely-coupled aeroelastic analysis. An optimization framework based on RISM is proposed. The aerodynamic and structural performances can be optimized simultaneously in this framework, so it may lead to the true optimal solution. The aerodynamic performance was predicted by N-S solver in this paper. Test shows that RISM predicts the aerodynamic and structural performances very well. A wing-body configuration was optimized by the proposed optimization framework. The drag and weight of the aircraft are decreased after optimization, which shows the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 315
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Kim Y(2006)Multi-objective and multi-disciplinary design optimization of supersonic fighter wing J Aircraft 43 817-824
[2]  
Jeon Y H(2009)Multi-disciplinary code coupling for analysis and optimization of aeroelastic systems J Aircraft 46 1938-1945
[3]  
Lee D H(2006)Aero-structural optimization of a transonic compressor rotor J Propul Power 22 880-888
[4]  
Nikbay M(2013)Development of a multilevel multi-disciplinary-optimization capability for an industrial environment AIAA J 51 2335-2352
[5]  
Öncü L(2011)Structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis, and optimization in aircraft conceptual design J Aircraft 48 1840-1855
[6]  
Aysan A(2012)Studies on the influence of spar position on aeroelastic optimization of a large aircraft wing Sci China Tech Sci 55 117-124
[7]  
Lian Y(2004)High-fidelity aero-structural design optimization of a supersonic business jet J Aircraft 41 523-530
[8]  
Liou M S(2008)Aeroelastic design optimization for laminar and turbulent flows Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197 1813-1832
[9]  
Piperni P(2007)Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization in MDO context J Comput Appl Math 23 548-560
[10]  
DeBlois A(2002)Jig-shape static aeroelastic wing design problem: A decoupled approach J Aircraft 39 1061-1066