The relationship between students’ self-assessed reading skills and other measures of achievement

被引:3
作者
Johansson S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg
关键词
PIRLS; 2001; Reading achievement; Structural equation modeling; Student self-assessment; Teacher judgment;
D O I
10.1186/2196-0739-1-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study explored the credibility of Swedish third-grade students’ self-assessments of their reading achievement by relating those assessments to two different criteria—teachers’ judgments and students’ reading test scores. Student gender and socioeconomic status (SES) were introduced to determine to what extent, if any, these variables were associated with the accuracy of the self-assessments once students’ attitudes toward reading had been controlled for. Methods: The data, drawn from the Swedish participation in the 2001 iteration of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), conducted by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), included information obtained from students (N = 5,271) and teachers (N = 351). The main method of analysis was two-level structural equation modeling (SEM) with latent variables. Results: The magnitude of the correlation between student self-assessments and teacher judgments/test scores was similar and amounted to about 0.6. The relationship between teachers’ judgments and students’ test scores was slightly higher. Neither gender nor SES seemed to be significantly related to the self-assessments, indicating that the students assessed themselves in a fairly equal manner across groups. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that, despite their young age, third-graders’ self-assessment of their reading literacy skills can be considered as fairly reliable indicators of those skills. In Sweden, the fact that Grade 3 students and their teachers have spent almost three years together in school may contribute to a shared understanding of what literacy knowledge and skills are important. © 2013, Johansson; licensee Springer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Bentler P.M., Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bullentin, 107, 2, pp. 238-246, (1990)
[2]  
Black P., Wiliam D., Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 1, pp. 7-74, (1998)
[3]  
Blatchford P., Pupils’ self-assessments of academic attainment at 7, 11 and 16 years: Effects of sex and ethnic group, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 2, pp. 169-184, (1997)
[4]  
Boekaerts M., Subjective competence, appraisals and self-assessment, Learning and Instruction, 1, 1, pp. 1-17, (1991)
[5]  
Butler Y.G., Lee J., On-task versus off-task self-assessments among Korean elementary school students studying English, Modern Language Journal, 90, 4, pp. 506-518, (2006)
[6]  
Campbell J.R., Kelly D.L., Mullis I.V.S., Martin M.O., Sainsbury M., Framework and specifications for PIRLS assessment 2001, (2001)
[7]  
Elley W.B., How in the world do students read?, (1992)
[8]  
Falchikov N., Boud D., Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 59, 4, pp. 395-430, (1989)
[9]  
Feinberg A.B., Shapiro E.S., Teacher accuracy: An examination of teacher-based judgments of students’ reading with differing achievement levels, Journal of Educational Research, 102, pp. 453-462, (2009)
[10]  
Fredriksson U., Villalba E., Taube K., Do students correctly estimate their reading ability? A study of Stockholm students in Grades 3 and 8, Reading Psychology, 32, pp. 301-321, (2011)