Sucrose Accumulation in Sugar Beet: From Fodder Beet Selection to Genomic Selection

被引:0
|
作者
Parviz Fasahat
Mohsen Aghaeezadeh
Leila Jabbari
Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati
Paul Townson
机构
[1] Education and Extension Organization (AREEO),Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research
[2] Education and Extension Organization (AREEO),Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research
[3] Lion Seeds Ltd,undefined
来源
Sugar Tech | 2018年 / 20卷
关键词
Sucrose accumulation; Sucrose transport; Sugar beet;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sucrose has been known as the main form of energy transport and storage in many economically important plant species. For the past two centuries, sugar beet has been selected as a source of sweetener in human diets for its high sucrose content. Over the past decades, sugar beet breeding has achieved significant goals in the development of taproot yield and sucrose yield. There is still scope for improvement, despite the fact that the sucrose concentration of the taproot today is around 15–20% of the beet’s fresh weight. Sucrose accumulation begins early in the growing season and increases linearly with time in the first half of the development, and saturation is reached in the second half. Desirable hybrids are expected to have small-cell root tissue and a rapid cell division rate as well as bearing the characteristic of high sucrose cultivars. Results of different studies have shown that sugar concentration is influenced greatly by the maternal parent under additive inheritance. The root selection for this trait at early developing programmes may be done by simple selection methods; however, improving above normal limit/percentage demands more complicated/expensive methods. The ease of molecular markers application and also linkage mapping approaches paved the way for sugar beet breeding. Beside sucrose extraction, producing sugar beets with high fructan accumulation, extracting ethanol from its glucose, and biobased materials formation from beet waste assure a promising future for this crop. The present review focuses on the advancements made in understanding sucrose accumulation in the sugar beet root.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 644
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fodder beet is a reservoir of drought tolerance alleles for sugar beet breeding
    Wisniewska, Anita
    Andryka-Dudek, Paulina
    Czerwinski, Mateusz
    Choluj, Danuta
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 145 : 120 - 131
  • [22] Yield and quality of sugar beet crown as well as leaf yield of different sugar beet varieties and a fodder beet
    Hoffmann, Christa
    ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2011, 136 (08): : 555 - 564
  • [23] CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN LEAVES OF ORGANIC GROWN FODDER BEET AND SUGAR BEET
    Honsova, Hana
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2009, 125 (5-6): : 177 - 179
  • [24] BEET SENSITIVITY - ALLERGIC REACTIONS FROM THE INGESTION OF BEET SUGAR (SUCROSE) AND MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE OF BEET ORIGIN
    RANDOLPH, TG
    ROLLINS, JP
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1950, 36 (03): : 407 - 415
  • [25] Selection for sugar yield in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris, using different selection indices
    Geidel, H
    Weber, WE
    Mechelke, W
    Haufe, W
    PLANT BREEDING, 2000, 119 (02) : 188 - 190
  • [26] PHENOTYPIC POLYMORPHISM AND ALLELE DIFFERENTIATION OF ISOZYMES IN FODDER BEET, MULTIGERM SUGAR-BEET AND MONOGERM SUGAR-BEET
    NAGAMINE, T
    CATTY, JP
    FORDLLOYD, BV
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1989, 77 (05) : 711 - 720
  • [27] SELECTION OF SITE AND FORGOING CROP FOR SUGAR-BEET
    SVACHULA, V
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 1993, 109 (08): : 170 - 174
  • [28] A case study of subset selection in sugar beet breeding
    Dourleijn, J
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1996, 54 (03) : 323 - 344
  • [29] Cultivar selection for sugar beet root rot resistance
    Strausbaugh, C. A.
    Eujayl, I. A.
    Foote, P.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 100 (06) : S123 - S123
  • [30] Cultivar selection for bacterial root rot in sugar beet
    Strausbaugh, C. A.
    Eujayl, I. A.
    Foote, P.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) : S125 - S125