Molecular surveillance and genetic diversity of Anaplasma spp. in cattle (Bos taurus) and goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) from Hainan island/province, China

被引:0
作者
Sa Zhou
Liangyuan Huang
Yang Lin
Biswajit Bhowmick
Jianguo Zhao
Chenghong Liao
Qingfeng Guan
Jinhua Wang
Qian Han
机构
[1] One Health Institute,College of Animal Science and Technology
[2] Hainan University,Laboratory of Tropical Veterinary Medicine and Vector Biology, School of Life Sciences
[3] Hainan University,undefined
[4] Hainan University,undefined
来源
BMC Veterinary Research | / 19卷
关键词
Ruminants; Nested PCR; Hainan; Co-infection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Anaplasmosis is a highly prevalent tick-borne intracellular bacterial disease that affects various host species globally, particularly ruminants in tropical and subtropical regions. However, information regarding the distribution and epidemiology of anaplasmosis in small and large ruminants on Hainan Isalnd is limited. To address this knowledge gap, the present study aimed to assess the occurrence of Anaplasma spp. infections in goats (N = 731) and cattle (N = 176) blood samples using nested PCR and conventional PCR based assays. The results revealed an overall prevalence of 30.1% in goats and 14.8% in cattle. The infection rates of A. bovis, A. phagocytophilum, A. ovis and A. capra in goat samples were 22.7%, 13.8%, 2.0% and 3.4%, respectively, while the infection rates of A. bovis, A. phagocytophilum and A. marginale in cattle samples were 11.4%, 6.3% and 5.7%, respectively. A. bovis exhibited the highest prevalence among the Anaplasma spp. in both goat and cattle samples. In addition, the most frequent co-infection was the one with A. phagocytophilum and A. bovis. It was found that the age, sex and feeding habits of cattle and goats were considered to be important risk factors. Evaluation of the risk factor relating to the rearing system showed that the infection rate for the free-range goats and cattle was significantly higher when compared with stall-feeding system.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 213 条
  • [1] Li H(2015)Human infection with a novel tick-borne Anaplasma species in China: a surveillance study Lancet Infect Dis 15 663-70
  • [2] Zheng YC(2017)Tick-Borne Emerging Infections: Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Clin Lab Med 37 317-340
  • [3] Ma L(2015)Low risk of seroconversion or clinical disease in humans after a bite by an Anaplasma phagocytophilum-infected tick Ticks Tick Borne Dis 6 787-92
  • [4] Ismail N(2005)Equine and canine Anaplasma phagocytophilum strains isolated on the island of Sardinia (Italy) are phylogenetically related to pathogenic strains from the United States Appl Environ Microbiol 71 6418-22
  • [5] McBride JW(2017)Molecular typing and diagnosis of Anaplasma spp. closely related to Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ruminants from Tunisia Ticks Tick Borne Dis 8 412-422
  • [6] Henningsson Anna J(2018)Anaplasma spp. in North Africa: A review on molecular epidemiology, associated risk factors and genetic characteristics Ticks Tick Borne Dis 9 543-555
  • [7] Alberti A(2020)First detection and molecular identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in an introduced population of Reeve's muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in United Kingdom Mol Cell Probes 52 101582-29
  • [8] Zobba R(2018)Update on flea and tick associated diseases of cats Vet Parasitol 254 26-33
  • [9] Chessa B(2013)Anaplasma phagocytophilum–a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3 31-112
  • [10] Ben Said M(2020)Genetic diversity of gro EL and msp4 sequences of Anaplasma ovis infecting camels from Tunisia Parasitol Int 74 101980-107