Minimally Invasive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Literature Review of Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

被引:0
作者
Michelle M. Takase-Sanchez
Douglass S. Hale
机构
关键词
Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic reconstructive surgery; Minimally invasive gynecology; Urogynecology; Laparoscopy; Robotic-assisted; Anterior repair; Paravaginal repair; Cystocele; Posterior repair; Rectocele; Enterocele; Hysteropexy; Cervicopexy; Uterosacral suspension; Colpopexy; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacral colpopexy; Mesh; Graft;
D O I
10.1007/s13669-013-0050-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse includes transvaginal, open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches. Laparoscopy has established a significant role in minimally invasive surgery across surgical disciplines. In pelvic surgery, although the vaginal approach may offer the most native route to a minimally invasive technique, advances in gynecologic laparoscopy have reported advantages over traditional routes maintaining safety, efficacy, and high patient satisfaction. Majority of current data is limited to descriptive case series and retrospective data that nonetheless continue to support the laparoscopic approach as a reasonably safe alternative to open and vaginal approaches. Few prospective, clinical trials have compared the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of various approaches and surgical techniques highlighting challenges in the utility of robotic-assistance and vaginal graft placement. This literature review provides a summary of important historical and current data in regards to surgical technique and clinical outcomes of advanced pelvic laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:8
相关论文
共 189 条
  • [21] Saidi MH(2003)The tensile strength of uterosacral ligament sutures: a comparison of vaginal and laparoscopic techniques Obstet Gynecol 101 500-503
  • [22] Vancaillie TG(2009)Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches J Repod Med 54 273-280
  • [23] White AJ(2005)Laparoscopic vaginal vault suspension using uterosacral ligaments: a review of 133 cases J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12 216-220
  • [24] Pasic RP(2006)Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes Obstet Gynecol 108 255-263
  • [25] Rizzo JA(2001)High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 1339-1342
  • [26] Fang H(2011)Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension using delayed absorbable monofilament suture Int Urogynecol J 22 1389-1394
  • [27] Judd JP(2010)Suture complications in a teaching institution among patients undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension with permanent braided suture Int Urogynecol J 21 813-818
  • [28] Siddiqui NY(2012)High uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: comparison of absorbable vs permanent suture for apical fixation Int Urogynecol J 23 941-945
  • [29] Barnett JC(2004)Pelvic floor disorders network. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review Obstet Gynecol 104 805-823
  • [30] Delancey JO(2009)The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review Eur Urol 55 1089-1103