Minimally Invasive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Literature Review of Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

被引:0
作者
Michelle M. Takase-Sanchez
Douglass S. Hale
机构
关键词
Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic reconstructive surgery; Minimally invasive gynecology; Urogynecology; Laparoscopy; Robotic-assisted; Anterior repair; Paravaginal repair; Cystocele; Posterior repair; Rectocele; Enterocele; Hysteropexy; Cervicopexy; Uterosacral suspension; Colpopexy; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacral colpopexy; Mesh; Graft;
D O I
10.1007/s13669-013-0050-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse includes transvaginal, open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches. Laparoscopy has established a significant role in minimally invasive surgery across surgical disciplines. In pelvic surgery, although the vaginal approach may offer the most native route to a minimally invasive technique, advances in gynecologic laparoscopy have reported advantages over traditional routes maintaining safety, efficacy, and high patient satisfaction. Majority of current data is limited to descriptive case series and retrospective data that nonetheless continue to support the laparoscopic approach as a reasonably safe alternative to open and vaginal approaches. Few prospective, clinical trials have compared the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of various approaches and surgical techniques highlighting challenges in the utility of robotic-assistance and vaginal graft placement. This literature review provides a summary of important historical and current data in regards to surgical technique and clinical outcomes of advanced pelvic laparoscopy for pelvic organ prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:8
相关论文
共 189 条
  • [1] Diwan A(2006)Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 79-83
  • [2] Rardin CR(2006)Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13 472-475
  • [3] Strohsnitter WC(1994)Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse Obstet Gynecol 84 885-888
  • [4] Medina C(2013)A randomized controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study Int Urogynecol J 24 377-384
  • [5] Takacs P(2005)Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 1752-1758
  • [6] Nezhat CH(2007)Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse J Endourol 21 926-930
  • [7] Nezhat F(2009)A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20 273-279
  • [8] Nezhat C(1996)Complications of major operative laparoscopy. A review of 452 cases J Reprod Med 41 471-476
  • [9] Freeman RM(2010)Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17 730-738
  • [10] Pantazis K(2010)Cost-minimization analysis of robotic- assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17 493-499