Iterative and Participative Axiomatic Design Process in complex mechanical assemblies: case study on fusion engineering

被引:17
作者
Di Gironimo G. [1 ,3 ]
Lanzotti A. [1 ]
Marzullo D. [1 ]
Esposito G. [1 ]
Carfora D. [2 ]
Siuko M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Industrial Engineering Department (DII), ENEA/CREATE, University of Naples “Federico II”, Piazzale Tecchio 80, Napoli
[2] VTT Systems Engineering, Tekniikankatu 1, Tampere
[3] Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Unversità degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Piazzale Tecchio 80, Napoli
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Axiomatic Design; Concept design; DEMO divertor locking system; Fuzzy-AHP; Systems engineering;
D O I
10.1007/s12008-015-0270-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present paper proposes a structured Product Development Lifecycle (PDL) model to deal with the concept design stage of complex assemblies. The proposed method provides a systematic approach to design, aimed to improve requirements management, project management and communication among stakeholders as well as to avoid project failures reducing project development time. This research also provides suggestions and recommendations for utilizing different analysis, synthesis and assessment methodologies along with the proposed approach. The process developed, named Iterative and Participative Axiomatic Design Process (IPADeP), is consistent with ISO/IEC 15288:2008 – “Systems and software engineering”, and INCOSE Systems engineering handbook. It is an iterative and incremental design process, participative and requirements driven, based on the theory of Axiomatic Product Development Lifecycle (APDL). IPADeP provides a systematic methodology in which, starting from a set of experts’ assumptions, a number of conceptual solutions are generated, analysed and evaluated. Based on the results obtained, new iterations can be performed for each level of decomposition while product requirements are refined. In this paper, we applied IPADeP to the initial phase of conceptual design activities for DEMO divertor-to-vacuum vessel locking system in order to propose new innovative solutions. © 2015, Springer-Verlag France.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 338
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Li W., Qiu Z., State-of-the-art technologies and methodologies for collaborative product development systems, International Journal of Production Research, 44, 13, pp. 2525-2559, (2006)
[2]  
Kim Y.S., Cochran D.S., Reviewing TRIZ from the perspective of Axiomatic Design, Journal of Engineering Design, 11, 1, pp. 79-94, (2000)
[3]  
Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., Grote K.-H., Engineering design: a systematic approach, 157, (2007)
[4]  
Legardeur J., Boujut J.F., Tiger H., Lessons learned from an empirical study of the early design phases of an unfulfilled innovation, Research in Engineering Design, 21, 4, pp. 249-262, (2010)
[5]  
Fredriksson B., Systems engineering-a holistic approach to product development, Griffin, 94, (1994)
[6]  
Haskins C., Forsberg K., Krueger M., Walden D., Hamelin D., Systems engineering handbook, INCOSE, (2006)
[7]  
Gumus B., Ertas A., Tate D., Cicek I., The transdisciplinary product development lifecycle model, Journal of Engineering Design, 19, 3, pp. 185-200, (2008)
[8]  
Albano L.D., Et al., Engineering Design, (1999)
[9]  
Suh N.P., The principles of design, (1990)
[10]  
N.P., (2001)