Implication of coronary CT angiography combined with four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for predicting major adverse cardiac events

被引:0
作者
Xiaohua Yin
Rong Xu
Yingchun Wang
Tao Cheng
Hui Zhou
机构
[1] Jiading Central Hospital,Department of Radiology
[2] Jiading Central Hospital,Department of Ultrasound
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2018年 / 34卷
关键词
Coronary computed tomography angiography; Four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography; Risk factors; Major adverse cardiac events; Atherosclerotic plaque;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide abundant information about the anatomy of the coronary artery. However, this modality is limited in evaluation of myocardial function. Four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (4DSTE) is a novel and sensitive technique for quantitative evaluation of myocardial deformation. We estimated the value of these imaging modalities to predict the risk of MACE in 209 patients with suspected coronary artery disease(CAD) after a median follow-up of 727 days. Three models were established: (1) CCTA alone, (2) CCTA combined with 4DSTE, and (3) CCTA combined with 4DSTE and clinical risk factors. Forty-six (22.0%) patients developed MACE. The hazard ratio (HR) of CCTA classification to predict the risk of MACE was greater (HR = 4.86) than for other parameters, including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (HR = 2.44) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR = 0.40). The area under the curve of models 2 and 3 to predict MACE was significantly greater than that of model 1 (0.92 and 0.93 vs. 0.84, respectively, p < 0.001). We conclude that there is direct relationship between CCTA classification and MACE risk. CCTA combined with 4DSTE can improve the ability of CCTA to predict the risk of MACE. This approach provides cardiologists a noninvasive, objective, and efficient method to predict MACE.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1293
页数:6
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
He B(2013)Correlation between major adverse cardiac events and coronary plaque characteristics Exp Clin Cardiol 18 e71e76-952
[2]  
Gai L(2004)Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study Lancet 364 937-704
[3]  
Gai J(2013)Evaluation of framingham and systematic coronary risk evaluation scores by coronary computed tomographic angiography in asymptomatic adults Am J Cardio 111 700-106
[4]  
Qiao H(2014)Prognostic value of TIMI score versus GRACE score in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Arq Bras Cardiol 103 98-231
[5]  
Zhang S(2015)Risk stratification for the development of heart failure after acute coronary syndrome at the time of hospital discharge: predictive ability of GRACE risk score J Cardiol 66 224-694
[6]  
Guan Z(2003)Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study BMJ 327 1267-1161
[7]  
Yang L(2008)Correlation between NT-pro BNP grades and left ventricular wall stress, sphericity index and extent of myocardial damage: a magnetic resonance imaging study J Card Fail 14 687-1063
[8]  
Chen Y(2014)Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction Nucl Med Commun 35 1156-754
[9]  
Yusuf S(2013)Assessment of coronary artery disease risk in 5463 patients undergoing cardiac surgery: when is preoperative coronary angiography necessary? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146 1055-1553
[10]  
Hawken S(2013)Cost efficiency analysis of CT coronary angiography for exclusion of significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison with conventional invasive coronary angiography before cardiac surgery Radiologe 53 752-542