Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech

被引:14
作者
Armstrong, Alex G. [1 ]
Lam, Chi Chung [1 ]
Sabesan, Shievanie [1 ]
Lesica, Nicholas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ear Inst, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
DYNAMIC-RANGE COMPRESSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; WORD RECOGNITION; LISTENERS; NOISE; MASKING; INTELLIGIBILITY; REPRESENTATION; PERFORMANCE; AUDIBILITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41551-021-00707-y
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In quiet environments, hearing aids improve the perception of low-intensity sounds. However, for high-intensity sounds in background noise, the aids often fail to provide a benefit to the wearer. Here, using large-scale single-neuron recordings from hearing-impaired gerbils-an established animal model of human hearing-we show that hearing aids restore the sensitivity of neural responses to speech, but not their selectivity. Rather than reflecting a deficit in supra-threshold auditory processing, the low selectivity is a consequence of hearing-aid compression (which decreases the spectral and temporal contrasts of incoming sound) and amplification (which distorts neural responses, regardless of whether hearing is impaired). Processing strategies that avoid the trade-off between neural sensitivity and selectivity should improve the performance of hearing aids. Large-scale single-neuron recordings from hearing-impaired gerbils show that compression and amplification algorithms used in hearing aids restore the sensitivity of neural responses to speech, but not their selectivity.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 730
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
AKEROYD MA, 2014, TRENDS HEAR, V18
[2]   Effects of WDRC Release Time and Number of Channels on Output SNR and Speech Recognition [J].
Alexander, Joshua M. ;
Masterson, Katie .
EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (02) :E35-E49
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Cochlear hearing loss: Physiological, psychological and technical issues
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BOSE HEARPHONES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Report to the President: Science and Technology to Ensure the Safety of the Nations Drinking Water
[6]  
BAER T, 1993, J REHABIL RES DEV, V30, P49
[7]   A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments [J].
Brody, Lisa ;
Wu, Yu-Hsiang ;
Stangl, Elizabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 27 (04) :581-593
[8]   Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression [J].
Brown, Andrew D. ;
Rodriguez, Francisco A. ;
Portnuff, Cory D. F. ;
Goupell, Matthew J. ;
Tollin, Daniel J. .
TRENDS IN HEARING, 2016, 20
[9]   Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification [J].
Ching, TYC ;
Dillon, H ;
Byrne, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 103 (02) :1128-1140
[10]   Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid [J].
Cho, Young Sang ;
Park, Su Yeon ;
Seol, Hye Yoon ;
Lim, Ji Hyun ;
Cho, Yang-Sun ;
Hong, Sung Hwa ;
Moon, Il Joon .
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2019, 145 (06) :516-522