Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial (vol 21, 156, 2021)

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
Li, Shuang [1 ]
Liu, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Mengcheng Cty 1 Peoples Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Mengcheng 233500, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Anaesthesia; Benzodiazepine; Hysteroscopy; Propofol; Remifentanil; Remimazolam besylate;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-021-01390-x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Remimazolam besylate is a newer benzodiazepine with characteristics of quick onset of effects, short maintenance and recovery times without accumulation in tissues. This trial was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P). Group R was administered an induction dose of 0.2 mg/kg and a maintenance dosage of 1.0 mg/kg/h. In Group P, propofol was started at 1.5–2.0 mg/kg and then maintained at 3.0–6.0 mg/kg/h. After remimazolam besylate or propofol induction, remifentanil was infused using a target-controlled infusion system with a target concentration of 1.5 ng/ml and titrated during the procedure. The incidence rates of injection pain, low oxygen saturation (SpO2) and adverse effects in both groups were compared. Results: Eighty-two patients were included in this study. The incidence of adverse events in Group R (3.7%) was significantly lower than that in Group P (36.6%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of injection pain in Group P (80.5%) was much higher than that in Group R (2.4%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of other adverse events, such as low SpO2, bradycardia, and hypotension in Group R was lower than that in Group P (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Remimazolam besylate proves to be a safer alternative for anesthesia during hysteroscopy. Moreover, adverse events caused by propofol, such as low SpO2 and injection pain, are largely avoided. Trial registration: This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Mengcheng County No. 1 People’s Hospital (2020MYL20003) and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (15/09/2020, ChiCTR-2000038252). The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Comparison of hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia with remimazolam and target-controlled propofol in middle-aged and elderly patients: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
    Ryo Sekiguchi
    Michiko Kinoshita
    Ryosuke Kawanishi
    Nami Kakuta
    Yoko Sakai
    Katsuya Tanaka
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil during fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Wu, Bin
    Zhu, Wenchao
    Wang, Qinghe
    Ren, Chunguang
    Wang, Lizhen
    Xie, Guannan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [43] Safety and efficacy of fentanyl versus pethidine in cataract surgery under propofol- based sedation: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
    Shetabi, Hamidreza
    Hashemi, Seyed
    Haghi, Fariba
    Farsani, Dariush Moradi
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 25
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of esketamine versus propofol in electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Zeng, Qing-Bin
    Zou, De-Cheng
    Huang, Xing-Bing
    Shang, De-Wei
    Huang, Xiong
    Yang, Xin-Hu
    Ning, Yu-Ping
    Balbuena, Lloyd
    Xiang, Yu-Tao
    Zheng, Wei
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2025, 368 : 320 - 328
  • [45] The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: Study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, positive-controlled clinical trial
    Fang, Yu-Bo
    Wang, Cheng-Yu
    Gao, Yu-Qing
    Cai, Yu-Hang
    Chen, Jia
    Zhang, Xu-Lin
    Dong, Le-Qi
    Shang-Guan, Wang-Ning
    Liu, Hua-Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [46] Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial
    Li, Junxiang
    Wang, Xiao
    Liu, Jin
    Wang, Xia
    Li, Xiangkui
    Wang, Yaping
    Ouyang, Wen
    Li, Jun
    Yao, Shanglong
    Zhu, Zhaoqiong
    Guo, Qulian
    Yu, Yonghao
    Meng, Jinhai
    Zuo, Yunxia
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 131 (02) : 138 - 148
  • [47] Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of propofol sedation by anesthesiologists and gastroenterologist-led teams using computer-assisted personalized sedation during upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Kashiwagi, Kazuhiro
    Hosoe, Naoki
    Takahashi, Keiji
    Nishino, Haruo
    Miyachi, Hideyuki
    Kudo, Shin-ei
    Martin, James F.
    Ogata, Haruhiko
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 28 (06) : 657 - 664