Clinical re-biopsy of segmental gains—the primary source of preimplantation genetic testing false positives

[1] Girardi L(2020)Incidence, origin, and predictive model for the detection and clinical management of segmental aneuploidies in human embryos Am J Hum Genet 106 525-534

[2] Serdarogullari M(2009)De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements in prenatal diagnosis Prenat Diagn 29 257-265

[3] Patassini C(2018)Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51 445-452

[4] Poli M(2012)Rare chromosome abnormalities, prevalence and prenatal diagnosis rates from population-based congenital anomaly registers in Europe Eur J Hum Genet 20 521-526

[5] Fabiani M(2019)One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies Fertil Steril 111 280-293

[6] Caroselli S(2020)Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies Mol Hum Reprod 26 269-276

[7] Giardino D(2019)The clinicianś dilemma with mosaicism - an insight from inner cell mass biopsies Hum Reprod 34 998-1010

[8] Corti C(2018)Prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidy (>16 Mb) in human blastocysts as detected by next-generation sequencing Reprod Biomed Online 37 511-520

[9] Ballarati L(2019)Transfer of embryos with segmental mosaicism is associated with a significant reduction in live-birth rate Fertil Steril 111 69-76

[10] Colombo D(2020)The pregnancy outcome of mosaic embryo transfer: A prospective multicenter study and meta-analysis Genes 11 973-4

[1] Girardi L(2020)Incidence, origin, and predictive model for the detection and clinical management of segmental aneuploidies in human embryos Am J Hum Genet 106 525-534

[2] Serdarogullari M(2009)De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements in prenatal diagnosis Prenat Diagn 29 257-265

[3] Patassini C(2018)Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51 445-452

[4] Poli M(2012)Rare chromosome abnormalities, prevalence and prenatal diagnosis rates from population-based congenital anomaly registers in Europe Eur J Hum Genet 20 521-526

[5] Fabiani M(2019)One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies Fertil Steril 111 280-293

[6] Caroselli S(2020)Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies Mol Hum Reprod 26 269-276

[7] Giardino D(2019)The clinicianś dilemma with mosaicism - an insight from inner cell mass biopsies Hum Reprod 34 998-1010

[8] Corti C(2018)Prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidy (>16 Mb) in human blastocysts as detected by next-generation sequencing Reprod Biomed Online 37 511-520

[9] Ballarati L(2019)Transfer of embryos with segmental mosaicism is associated with a significant reduction in live-birth rate Fertil Steril 111 69-76

[10] Colombo D(2020)The pregnancy outcome of mosaic embryo transfer: A prospective multicenter study and meta-analysis Genes 11 973-4